CVE-1999-0005
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedArbitrary command execution via IMAP buffer overflow in authenticate command.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceBuffer overflow vulnerability in the IMAP protocol's authenticate command allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the mail server by overflowing a buffer with excessive input during the authentication process.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.55= 10.234CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed IMAP server softwareList running processes or installed services related to IMAP (imap, imapd, pop, pop3) using process manager or service enumeration tools. Check for service binaries and their associated version information.Affected if The server is running Netscape Messaging Server or University of Washington IMAP software.
-
Check Netscape Messaging Server versionQuery the Netscape Messaging Server version through its service information, configuration files, or by connecting to the IMAP port (143) and issuing version commands if available. Compare the installed version against 3.55.Affected if The installed version is exactly 3.55.
-
Check University of Washington IMAP versionQuery the UW IMAP daemon version through its binary information, service configuration, or by connecting to the IMAP port (143) and checking banner/version response. Compare against version 10.234.Affected if The installed version is exactly 10.234.
-
Verify IMAP service is accessibleConfirm the IMAP service is listening on ports 143 (IMAP) or 993 (IMAPS). Use network scanning or port enumeration to check if the service is exposed and accepting connections.Affected if The IMAP service is running and accessible on the network.
The server is affected if it runs Netscape Messaging Server version 3.55 or University of Washington IMAP version 10.234 with the IMAP service enabled and accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate or patch the affected IMAP server software to a version that addresses the buffer overflow vulnerability, or implement network segmentation to restrict IMAP access to trusted networks.
- This CVE (1999-0005) references extremely old Sun Microsystems products (Messaging Server 3.55, Imap 10.234) from approximately 1999.
- These legacy products are no longer supported and have been end-of-lifed for many years.
- There is no viable upgrade path available - Sun Messaging Server and the referenced IMAP daemon have been superseded by modern mail solutions.
- Modern deployments should replace these legacy systems with current, supported mail/messaging infrastructure (e.g., modern Dovecot, Courier, or commercial alternatives).
- If the system must remain operational, isolate it completely on a restricted network segment with no external access.
- Alternatively, decommission the affected systems entirely as they cannot be safely remediated.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-1999-0005 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-1999-0005 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data