CVE-1999-0040
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBuffer overflow in Xt library of X Windowing System allows local users to execute commands with root privileges.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer overflow vulnerability in the Xt library of the X Window System allows local unprivileged users to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges through malformed input handling.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.1.5.1= 2.0= 4.0= 5.0= 5.3= 6.0= 6.1= 6.2= 6.3= 6.4= 2.0= 2.0.1= 2.1= 9.00= 9.01= 9.10= 10.00= 10.01= 10.08= 10.09= 10.10= 10.16= 10.20= 10.24= 10.30= 3.2= 4.1= 4.2= 64= 4.2= 4.2mp= 4.2mpCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify if X Window System is installedRun 'which X' or 'which Xt' or check for /usr/X11* or /usr/lib/X11* directoriesAffected if X Window System is not installed then the system is not affected
-
Determine the Xt library versionCheck the Xt library file version: 'ls -la /usr/lib/libXt*' or use 'strings' on libXt.so to find version strings, or check the X11 version with 'X -version'Affected if The installed Xt library version matches one of the affected versions listed (FreeBSD 1.1.5.1/2.0, Irix 4.0-6.4, BSDi 2.0-2.1, HP-UX 9.00-10.30, AIX 3.2-4.2, NEC variants)
-
Confirm the operating system versionRun 'uname -a' or 'oslevel' (AIX) or 'swlist' (HP-UX) to get the exact OS versionAffected if The OS version matches any of the affected versions listed in the CVE
-
Check for presence of local unprivileged user accountsReview /etc/passwd for non-root users, or run 'id' to see current user privilegesAffected if The system has local unprivileged user accounts that could exploit this local privilege escalation vulnerability
A system is affected if it runs one of the listed OS versions with the X Window System/Xt library installed and has untrusted local users able to access the Xt input handling code.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor patches or upgrade to a patched version of the X Window System/Xt library; restrict local access to trusted users until patched.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,992.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-1999-0040 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-1999-0040 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data