CVE-1999-0088
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIRIX and AIX automountd services (autofsd) allow remote users to execute root commands.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe automountd (autofsd) service on legacy IRIX and AIX operating systems contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute commands with root privileges. This is a critical flaw in the automount daemon that handles automatic mounting of file systems.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 4.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the operating system and versionRun 'uname -a' or 'oslevel' (AIX) to determine the exact OS version. For AIX specifically, use 'oslevel -r' to get the release level.Affected if The system is running IBM AIX 4.3 or any version of IRIX.
-
Verify if the automountd or autofsd service is installedCheck for the presence of the automountd binary: 'which automountd' or 'which autofsd' on AIX/IRIX. Also check /etc/inetd.conf or /etc/rc.config for automountd entries.Affected if The automountd or autofsd binary exists and is configured on the system.
-
Determine if the automount daemon is currently runningRun 'ps -ef | grep automountd' or 'ps -ef | grep autofsd' to check for running processes.Affected if The automountd or autofsd process is active.
-
Check if the service is listening on network portsRun 'netstat -an | grep 699' or check /etc/services for the automount port. Also verify inetd configuration: 'grep -i automount /etc/inetd.conf'.Affected if The automount service is bound to a network interface and listening for remote connections.
-
Assess network exposureReview firewall rules and network segmentation. Determine if legacy AIX or IRIX systems have any network connectivity, especially to untrusted networks.Affected if The vulnerable system is network-accessible from any location beyond a completely isolated air-gapped network.
A system is affected only if it is running AIX 4.3 or IRIX with the automountd service enabled, running, and network-accessible, allowing remote attackers to execute commands with root privileges without authentication.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedModern systems are not affected by this vulnerability as it was patched decades ago. Organizations should verify no legacy IRIX or AIX systems remain in their environment; if found, these systems should be decommissioned or completely isolated from all network access as they are no longer supported.
AIX 5.3 or later (AIX 4.3 is end-of-life and no longer supported)
- 1. Determine if the automountd (autofsd) service is required for system operation. If not needed, disable it entirely.
- 2. If the service is required, check if IBM released a patch for AIX 4.3 for this vulnerability by contacting IBM support or searching IBM's historical patch database (https://www-01.ibm.com/support/).
- 3. As an immediate mitigation, add firewall rules to block RPC port 100299 (automountd) from untrusted network sources.
- 4. Use the 'rmssvc' or 'mkssys' commands to disable the automountd service: rmssvc automountd or stopsrc -s automountd
- 5. Restrict network access to the system using TCP wrappers or AIX IP security to limit who can connect.
- 6. If the system must remain vulnerable, isolate it in a secured network segment with no external access.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,456.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-1999-0088 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-1999-0088 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data