CVE-1999-0160
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSome classic Cisco IOS devices have a vulnerability in the PPP CHAP authentication to establish unauthorized PPP connections.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceClassic Cisco IOS devices contain a vulnerability in the PPP CHAP (Challenge Handshake Authentication Protocol) authentication mechanism that allows attackers to establish unauthorized PPP connections without valid credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 4.1= 9.1= 10.3= 11.0= 11.1= 11.2= 11.2pCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Cisco IOS versionRun 'show version' on the device console or via telnet/ssh and locate the 'IOS' line showing the version number (for example, 'IOS (tm) 3000 Software...').Affected if The version matches one of the affected releases: 4.1, 9.1, 10.3, 11.0, 11.1, 11.2, or 11.2p.
-
Check if PPP is enabled on any interfaceRun 'show running-config | include ppp' or 'show interface' and look for interfaces with 'PPP' in the encapsulation type.Affected if PPP encapsulation is configured on any interface (for example, 'encapsulation ppp' under a serial or dialer interface).
-
Verify CHAP authentication is configured for PPPRun 'show running-config' and search for 'ppp authentication chap' under the relevant interface configuration, or use 'show ip interface' to see authentication methods.Affected if The device has 'ppp authentication chap' or 'ppp authentication chap pap' configured on a PPP interface.
-
Confirm PPP is accepting incoming connectionsRun 'show ppp interface' or 'show dialer interface' to see active PPP sessions, and check for 'dialer' or 'async' interfaces configured with PPP.Affected if The device has PPP interfaces configured to accept incoming calls or dialout connections.
You are affected if your device runs an affected Cisco IOS version (4.1, 9.1, 10.3, 11.0, 11.1, 11.2, or 11.2p) AND has PPP with CHAP authentication enabled and configured to accept connections.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade affected devices to a patched Cisco IOS version, or if devices are end-of-life, replace them. Implement additional network access controls around PPP endpoints as a compensating control.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-1999-0160 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-1999-0160 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data