CVE-1999-0209
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe SunView (SunTools) selection_svc facility allows remote users to read files.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe SunView (SunTools) selection_svc facility contains a vulnerability that allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files on the target system. The selection service, designed for inter-application data sharing in the SunView windowing environment, does not properly validate incoming requests, enabling unauthorized file system access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.5= 4.0= 4.0.1= 4.0.2= 4.0.3= 4.1= 4.1.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the operating systemRun 'uname -a' to see if the system is running SunOSAffected if The OS is not SunOS (this CVE only applies to SunOS)
-
Check the SunOS versionRun 'uname -r' or 'cat /etc/motd' to determine the exact version numberAffected if Version is 3.5, 4.0, 4.0.1, 4.0.2, 4.0.3, 4.1, or 4.1.1
-
Determine if SunView/SunTools is installedCheck for the presence of /usr/lib/sunview or /usr/bin/sunview directories, or try 'which sunview'Affected if SunView binaries or libraries are present on the system
-
Check if selection_svc is runningLook for the selection_svc process using 'ps -ax | grep selection_svc' or check for port 58200/tcp (the default selection service port) with 'netstat -an | grep 58200'Affected if The selection_svc process is active or port 58200 is listening
A system is affected only if it runs one of the listed SunOS versions (3.5 through 4.1.1) AND has SunView with the selection_svc facility enabled and running.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataDisable the selection_svc facility if SunView/SunTools is still in use, as this is obsolete legacy technology. For any systems still running SunView, migrate to modern windowing systems or upgrade the operating environment.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,456.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-1999-0209 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-1999-0209 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data