CVE-1999-0227
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAccess violation in LSASS.EXE (LSA/LSARPC) program in Windows NT allows a denial of service.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAccess violation in LSASS.EXE (Local Security Authority Subsystem) on Windows NT allows remote or local attackers to cause a denial of service by triggering an unhandled exception in the LSA/LSARPC service, crashing the security subsystem.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 4.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the operating system versionRun 'winmsd' or check System Properties to confirm the Windows version. On command line: 'ver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /C:"Windows NT"'Affected if The system is running Windows NT version 4.0 exactly (not later Windows versions)
-
Verify the LSASS.EXE process is presentOpen Task Manager or run 'tasklist /FI "IMAGENAME eq lsass.exe"' to confirm the Local Security Authority Subsystem process is runningAffected if LSASS.EXE is running, which is the default state on Windows NT 4.0 systems
-
Determine network exposure of LSARPC serviceCheck if the LSARPC endpoint (TCP/UDP port 445 or named pipe \pipe\lsarpc) is accessible from network sources. Use 'netstat -an' to list listening ports and assess network accessibilityAffected if The LSARPC service is exposed to untrusted network segments or the system is directly internet-facing on these endpoints
A system is affected if it is running Windows NT 4.0 with LSASS.EXE active and the LSARPC service is network-accessible to potential attackers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataWindows NT is obsolete and no longer supported; migrate affected systems to a supported Windows version. If running legacy NT systems is unavoidable, restrict network access to LSARPC endpoints and apply any historical Microsoft patches.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,424.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-1999-0227 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-1999-0227 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data