CVE-1999-0247
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBuffer overflow in nnrpd program in INN up to version 1.6 allows remote users to execute arbitrary commands.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer overflow vulnerability in nnrpd (Network News Transfer Protocol daemon) in InterNetNews (INN) versions up to 1.6 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via malformed input. The overflow occurs due to insufficient bounds checking when processing NNTP commands, enabling attackers to overwrite stack memory and inject malicious code.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.4= 1.4sec= 1.4sec2= 1.4unoff3= 1.4unoff4= 1.5= 1.5.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify INN versionRun `innd -v` or `innd -V` to display the installed INN version, or check your package manager (e.g., `rpm -q inn` or `dpkg -l inn`)Affected if The version displayed is 1.4, 1.4sec, 1.4sec2, 1.4unoff3, 1.4unoff4, 1.5, or 1.5.1
-
Confirm nnrpd binary versionRun `nnrpd -v` or `nnrpd -V` to check the nnrpd daemon version specificallyAffected if The nnrpd version matches one of the affected INN versions listed above
-
Verify nnrpd is runningCheck running processes for nnrpd using `ps aux | grep nnrpd` or check if the NNTP port (119) is listeningAffected if nnrpd is actively running and serving NNTP connections, exposing the vulnerable code to network input
If INN/nnrpd version is 1.4 through 1.5.1 and nnrpd is running, the system is affected by this buffer overflow vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade INN to version 1.7.2 or later which contains the patched nnrpd binary, or apply vendor-supplied patches if upgrading is not feasible. If INN 1.6 is no longer supported, consider migrating to a supported news server solution.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-1999-0247 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-1999-0247 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data