CVE-1999-0309
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHP-UX vgdisplay program gives root access to local users.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe vgdisplay utility in HP-UX contains a vulnerability allowing local users to escalate privileges to root. This is a local privilege escalation flaw in the volume group display program.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 10.00= 10.01= 10.10= 10.20= 10.24CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the HP-UX versionRun 'uname -a' or 'swlist -l bundle' to determine the exact HP-UX version and patch levelAffected if The version listed is 10.00, 10.01, 10.10, 10.20, or 10.24
-
Locate the vgdisplay binaryRun 'which vgdisplay' or 'find /usr -name vgdisplay -type f 2>/dev/null' to find the vgdisplay utilityAffected if The vgdisplay binary exists on the system in /usr/bin or similar location
-
Verify vgdisplay file ownership and permissionsRun 'ls -la /usr/bin/vgdisplay' (or the path found above) to check ownership and permissionsAffected if The file is owned by root and has setuid permissions (-rwsr-xr-x) or is writable by non-root users
-
Confirm presence of local user accountsCheck /etc/passwd for local users with 'cat /etc/passwd' or list users with 'logins' commandAffected if Non-privileged local user accounts exist on the system who could potentially exploit the vulnerability
A system is affected if it runs HP-UX version 10.00, 10.01, 10.10, 10.20, or 10.24 AND has the vgdisplay binary installed with exploitable permissions, allowing local users to escalate to root.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the appropriate HP patch from HP's historical security bulletins for this vulnerability. If patches are unavailable due to system age, restrict access to the vgdisplay binary or migrate to a supported platform.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,880.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-1999-0309 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-1999-0309 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data