CVE-1999-0581
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT key in a Windows NT system has inappropriate, system-critical permissions.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT registry key in Windows NT systems has overly permissive access controls, allowing unauthorized users or processes to modify critical file associations, COM object registrations, and other system configurations stored in this critical registry hive.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Examine HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT permissionsOpen Registry Editor (regedt32.exe) and navigate to HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT, then go to Security > Permissions or use 'regedt32.exe' and select Security > Permissions from the menuAffected if Any user account or group other than Administrators, SYSTEM, or Creator Owner is listed with Write or Full Control permissions
-
Identify accounts with write accessReview the permission entries for HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT and document which security principals (users, groups) are granted Write, Full Control, or Special Access permissionsAffected if Non-administrative users or groups such as Users, Everyone, or Power Users have explicit Write or Full Control permissions
-
Check for excessive inherited permissionsIn the Permissions dialog for HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT, verify if permissions are inherited from parent keys and examine the Effective Permissions for standard user accountsAffected if Standard users inherit Write permissions from parent containers or have Effective Permissions that include Modify or Write access
-
Verify restricted accounts listCompare the permission list against expected secure baselines - only SYSTEM, Administrators, and Creator Owner should have Full Control; Users should have Read-only accessAffected if The permission list includes any account beyond the Administrators group and SYSTEM with elevated access rights
-
Test non-admin user accessIf available, log in as a non-administrative user and attempt to create or modify a file association key under HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT (e.g., create a new key under .txt)Affected if The non-administrative user can successfully create or modify registry keys in HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT
Your environment is affected if any non-administrative user or group has Write or Full Control permissions to HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT, allowing them to modify file associations, COM registrations, or other system configurations.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedReview and restrict permissions on HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT to ensure only Administrators and SYSTEM have write access; remove any unnecessary or overly permissive access control entries.
Upgrade to a supported Windows version (Windows 10/11 or Windows Server 2016+)
- No vendor patch is available for Windows NT, which has been end-of-life since 2004.
- Upgrade to a supported Windows operating system (such as Windows 10 or Windows 11) to receive security updates.
- If upgrade is not immediately possible, isolate the Windows NT system on a restricted network segment to reduce exposure.
- Consider replacing Windows NT systems entirely as they no longer receive security patches.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-1999-0581 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-1999-0581 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data