UnixwareOperating system · Sco

CVE-1999-0864

HIGH · 7.2 CVSS v2.0 Published 1999-12-03
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
77/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
UnixWare programs that dump core allow a local user to modify files via a symlink attack on the ./core.pid file.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

In UnixWare, programs that generate core dump files create them with predictable names (./core.pid) without checking if the file already exists or is a symlink. A local attacker can preemptively create a symlink with the expected core filename, causing the program's core dump to write to an arbitrary file the attacker specifies, leading to privilege escalation or data corruption.

MitigationConfigure core dumps to use safe file creation methods (O_EXCL flag) or store them in protected directories with restricted permissions to prevent symlink manipulation. Consider disabling core dumps in production or using secure temporary directories.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
UnixwareOperating system
Affected:= 7.0= 7.0.1= 7.1= 7.1.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the operating system version
    Run 'uname -a' or check /etc/os-release to confirm the OS is Sco UnixWare and obtain the exact version number (e.g., 7.0, 7.0.1, 7.1, or 7.1.1)
    Affected if The system runs Sco UnixWare version 7.0, 7.0.1, 7.1, or 7.1.1 and core dumps are enabled
  2. Determine if core dumps are enabled
    Run 'ulimit -c' to check the core dump size limit. A value greater than 0 means core dumps are enabled. Also check system-wide core dump configuration in /etc/default/init or via 'coreadm' if available
    Affected if Core dump size limit is set to unlimited or a non-zero value, indicating core dumps can be generated
  3. Inspect core dump directory permissions
    Check the directory where core dumps are written (typically the current working directory or /var/core) using 'ls -ld' to verify permissions
    Affected if The core dump directory is world-writable or writable by untrusted user groups, allowing symlink manipulation
  4. Check for suspicious symlinks
    Search for symlinks named 'core.*' in directories where programs typically execute or dump core files, using 'find / -type l -name "core.*" 2>/dev/null'
    Affected if Any symlinks matching the pattern 'core.pid' exist in executable or temporary directories, indicating potential exploitation setup
  5. Verify core dump file creation behavior
    Review the application's documentation or source code (if available) to confirm it creates core dumps using the predictable ./core.pid naming scheme without O_EXCL flag validation
    Affected if The program generates core files using predictable filenames in the current working directory without checking for existing files or symlinks

A system is affected if it runs Sco UnixWare 7.0-7.1.1, has core dumps enabled, and allows untrusted users to write to directories where core dumps are created, enabling symlink-based file overwrite attacks.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Configure core dumps to use safe file creation methods (O_EXCL flag) or store them in protected directories with restricted permissions to prevent symlink manipulation. Consider disabling core dumps in production or using secure temporary directories.

Fix this in Unixware Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-1999-0864 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-1999-0864 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data