Communigate ProApplication · Stalker

CVE-1999-0865

MEDIUM · 5.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 1999-12-03
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Buffer overflow in CommuniGatePro via a long string to the HTTP configuration port.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in CommuniGatePro that can be triggered by sending an excessively long string to the HTTP configuration port. This could potentially allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service.

MitigationUpdate CommuniGatePro to the latest version or apply available security patches. Additionally, restrict network access to the HTTP configuration port using firewall rules or network segmentation to limit exposure to untrusted networks.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Communigate ProApplication
Affected:= 3.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify CommuniGatePro installation
    Check for CommuniGatePro by examining running processes (ps aux | grep -i cgpro) or installed packages, or look for the CGAdmin application in Program Files on Windows or /opt/CommunigatePro on Unix-like systems
    Affected if CommuniGatePro software is present on the system
  2. Identify installed version
    Run the CGAdmin binary with version flag (./CGAdmin -v) or check the About section in the CGAdmin web interface if accessible, or examine the binary file version property
    Affected if The version is 3.1 specifically
  3. Locate HTTP configuration port
    Examine CommuniGatePro configuration files (usually in /var/CommuniGatePro or the config directory) for the HTTP admin port setting, commonly port 8080 or 8010
    Affected if An HTTP configuration port is defined in the configuration
  4. Check port accessibility
    Use netstat or ss to determine if the HTTP admin port is listening on all interfaces (0.0.0.0) or only localhost (127.0.0.1), and use nmap or telnet to verify if the port responds from external IP addresses
    Affected if The HTTP configuration port is bound to 0.0.0.0 or is reachable from untrusted networks
  5. Verify remote administration is enabled
    Check the CommuniGatePro settings file (CommuniGate.xml or similar) for the AdminEnabled or RemoteAdmin setting to determine if remote HTTP administration is permitted
    Affected if Remote administration over HTTP is enabled and the service is running

The environment is affected if CommuniGatePro version 3.1 is installed and the HTTP configuration port is accessible from network locations where untrusted users could send malicious requests.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update CommuniGatePro to the latest version or apply available security patches. Additionally, restrict network access to the HTTP configuration port using firewall rules or network segmentation to limit exposure to untrusted networks.

Fix this in Communigate Pro Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-1999-0865 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-1999-0865 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data