Realserver G2Application · Realnetworks

CVE-1999-0896

HIGH · 10.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 1999-11-04
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Buffer overflow in RealNetworks RealServer administration utility allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a long username and password.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the RealNetworks RealServer administration utility. The vulnerability is triggered by submitting excessively long username and password strings during authentication to the admin interface, which overflows the buffer and allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the target system.

MitigationApply available vendor patches for RealServer; if the product is end-of-life, migrate to a supported media server solution and implement network segmentation to limit exposure to the administration interface.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Realserver G2Application
Affected:= 1.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm RealServer installation
    Identify if RealNetworks RealServer software is installed on the system by checking for running processes or installed packages related to 'realserver' or 'real server'. On Linux, check /usr/local/ or common installation directories. On Windows, check Program Files.
    Affected if RealServer G2 version 1.0 is installed and running
  2. Determine installed RealServer version
    Run the appropriate command to query the RealServer version. This is typically available via the admin web interface, the server status page, or by running 'realserver -v' or similar version flag if available from the binary.
    Affected if The installed version is RealServer G2 build 1.0 or any version matching '1.0' in the product name
  3. Verify admin interface is enabled
    Check if the RealServer administration interface is enabled and accessible. This is typically accessible via HTTP on port 7078 (admin port). Verify the service is listening on the admin port.
    Affected if The admin interface port (commonly 7078) is open and responding
  4. Assess network exposure of admin interface
    Review firewall rules and network configuration to determine if the admin interface port is accessible from network segments other than localhost/management network. Use 'netstat -an' or similar to identify listening ports and their bind addresses.
    Affected if The admin interface port is bound to 0.0.0.0 or an exposed network interface accessible to untrusted users

A system is affected if RealServer G2 version 1.0 is installed with its admin interface exposed to the network where attackers can submit long authentication strings.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply available vendor patches for RealServer; if the product is end-of-life, migrate to a supported media server solution and implement network segmentation to limit exposure to the administration interface.

Fix this in Realserver G2 Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-1999-0896 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-1999-0896 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data