CVE-1999-0967
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBuffer overflow in the HTML library used by Internet Explorer, Outlook Express, and Windows Explorer via the res: local resource protocol.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceBuffer overflow vulnerability in the HTML parsing library used by Internet Explorer, Outlook Express, and Windows Explorer. The flaw is triggered through the res: local resource protocol handler, which allows loading resources from the local system. This could allow remote code execution when processing maliciously crafted resource entries.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 4.0all versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Internet Explorer versionOpen Internet Explorer, then go to Help > About Internet Explorer. Alternatively, check the registry key HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Version or look for iexplore.exe in Program Files and right-click > Properties > Details to see version info.Affected if The version is exactly 4.0 (all builds of IE 4.0 are affected)
-
Check if Outlook Express is installedLook for msimn.exe in Program Files (x86)\Outlook Express or check Add/Remove Programs for Outlook Express. On older Windows, check Start menu for Outlook Express shortcut.Affected if Outlook Express is installed on the system (all versions are affected)
-
Check if Windows Explorer is the legacy versionOpen Windows Explorer and note the interface style. On Windows 95/98/NT systems from this era, the shell is essentially Windows Explorer. Check system information for Windows version - older pre-NT systems running the legacy shell are affected.Affected if Running legacy Windows 95/98/NT with the older Windows Explorer shell (all versions are affected)
-
Confirm the res: protocol handler existsOpen Internet Explorer or Outlook Express and type res://path/to/resource in the address bar. If the browser attempts to load a local resource, the handler is present and active.Affected if The res: protocol is functional and can load local resources (required for the vulnerability to be triggerable)
If Internet Explorer version 4.0 is installed, or if Outlook Express or legacy Windows Explorer from the Windows 95/98/NT era are present with the res: protocol handler active, the system is vulnerable to this buffer overflow.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply relevant Microsoft security patches for the affected legacy Microsoft products. Consider migrating away from affected legacy software as they are no longer supported. The res: protocol handler may be disabled via registry modifications if the products cannot be updated.
- This is a 1999 vulnerability affecting obsolete software (Internet Explorer 4.0, Outlook Express, and Windows Explorer from the Windows 9x/early NT era).
- These products are no longer supported and cannot be patched through normal channels.
- For modern systems, ensure you are using current software: Microsoft Edge (not Internet Explorer) for browsing, and a modern email client instead of Outlook Express.
- If legacy systems require these applications, isolate them in highly restricted environments with no network access to the 'res:' protocol resources.
- Consider migrating away from any system still running these legacy applications as they pose significant security risks.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-1999-0967 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-1999-0967 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data