CVE-1999-1328
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedlinuxconf before 1.11.r11-rh3 on Red Hat Linux 5.1 allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files and gain root access via a symlink attack.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidencelinuxconf before version 1.11.r11-rh3 on Red Hat Linux 5.1 contains a symlink vulnerability where the application creates files in predictable locations without proper symlink checks, allowing a local unprivileged user to create a malicious symlink that causes linuxconf to overwrite arbitrary files with root privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 5.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if linuxconf package is installedOn Red Hat Linux 5.1, run 'rpm -q linuxconf' or check for the presence of the linuxconf binary in /usr/sbin/linuxconfAffected if The package is installed on the system
-
Determine installed linuxconf versionRun 'rpm -q --queryformat "%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}" linuxconf' or use 'linuxconf --version' if availableAffected if The version returned is lower than 1.11.r11-rh3 or the command fails (package too old to query)
-
Identify linuxconf file creation behaviorReview linuxconf configuration files in /etc/linuxconf/ or examine startup scripts in /etc/rc.d/ that invoke linuxconf for any automated file creation operationsAffected if Linuxconf is configured to create files in world-writable directories without symlink protection
-
Check for world-writable temp directoriesInspect directories where linuxconf may create files, such as /tmp or /var/tmp, for any existing symlinks pointing to sensitive system filesAffected if A symlink exists in a linuxconf temporary or log directory pointing to a system file and was created by a non-root user
A user is affected if linuxconf version 1.11.r11-rh3 or earlier is installed on Red Hat Linux 5.1 and the application creates files in predictable locations accessible to unprivileged users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade linuxconf to version 1.11.r11-rh3 or later, or remove/disable the linuxconf package if not required on the system.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,880.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-1999-1328 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-1999-1328 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data