CVE-1999-1329
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBuffer overflow in SysVInit in Red Hat Linux 5.1 and earlier allows local users to gain privileges.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceBuffer overflow vulnerability in SysVInit on Red Hat Linux 5.1 and earlier allows local unprivileged users to escalate to root privileges. This is a memory corruption flaw in the legacy init system daemon.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 5.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Linux distribution and versionRun 'cat /etc/redhat-release' or 'cat /etc/issue' to determine the installed Red Hat Linux versionAffected if The version displayed is 5.1 or earlier
-
Determine the init system in useRun 'ps -p 1 -o comm=' to identify which init process (PID 1) is running on the systemAffected if The output shows 'init' or 'sysvinit' rather than 'systemd' or 'upstart'
-
Check SysVInit package versionRun 'rpm -q sysvinit' or 'dpkg -l | grep sysvinit' depending on package manager to retrieve the installed SysVInit versionAffected if The version returned is unpatched and corresponds to the Red Hat 5.1 release or earlier
-
Verify if running as a legacy systemCheck if /proc/1/exe points to /sbin/init and verify the binary with 'ls -la /sbin/init' to confirm SysVInit is the active init systemAffected if The init binary is the legacy SysVInit rather than a modern alternatives like systemd
The system is affected if it is running Red Hat Linux 5.1 or earlier with SysVInit as the active init system, where an unpatched version of the init daemon is present.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataMigrate away from affected systems immediately; Red Hat Linux 5.1 and earlier are end-of-life and should be decommissioned. If legacy systems must be retained, isolate them in a secured environment with no network access.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-1999-1329 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-1999-1329 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data