Activelist ServerApplication · Icq

CVE-1999-1342

MEDIUM · 5.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 1999-10-17
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
ICQ ActiveList Server allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via malformed packets to the server's UDP port.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The ICQ ActiveList Server suffers from a denial of service vulnerability where specially crafted malformed UDP packets sent to the server's listening port can cause the service to crash. The vulnerability requires no authentication and can be exploited remotely via network access to the UDP port.

MitigationSince this is legacy ICQ infrastructure software from 1999, the primary mitigation is to identify and remove the obsolete service if no longer needed, or implement network-level UDP port filtering to restrict unauthorized sources.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Activelist ServerApplication
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check for ICQ ActiveList Server installation
    Search system processes, services, and installed programs for 'ActiveList' or 'ICQ' related components. On Windows, check Services control panel and installed programs list. On Unix-like systems, check running processes with commands like 'ps aux' or 'netstat -an'.
    Affected if ICQ ActiveList Server or related ICQ server components are found running or installed on the system
  2. Identify UDP port listeners
    Use network diagnostic tools to list all UDP ports in listening state. On Windows: 'netstat -anp UDP' or 'netstat -ano | findstr LISTENING'. On Unix: 'netstat -ulpn' or 'ss -ulpn'.
    Affected if Any unknown or unexpected UDP listening ports are found that may correspond to the ActiveList Server
  3. Verify network exposure of UDP services
    Review firewall rules and network perimeter configurations to determine if UDP ports used by the ICQ ActiveList Server are accessible from external networks. Check both host-based firewalls (Windows Firewall, iptables) and network-level firewalls.
    Affected if UDP ports associated with the ICQ ActiveList Server are permitted through firewalls and accessible from untrusted networks
  4. Check for legacy ICQ server configurations
    Examine system startup items, scheduled tasks, and service configurations for ICQ-related server software. Review any configuration files in directories associated with ICQ or messaging server deployments.
    Affected if ICQ server software or services are configured to start automatically and remain running

The environment is affected if ICQ ActiveList Server is installed and its UDP listening port is accessible from the network, since the vulnerability can be exploited remotely without authentication via malformed UDP packets.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Since this is legacy ICQ infrastructure software from 1999, the primary mitigation is to identify and remove the obsolete service if no longer needed, or implement network-level UDP port filtering to restrict unauthorized sources.

Fix this in Activelist Server Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing1.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
5.0 hours of engineering $890
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,424.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-1999-1342 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-1999-1342 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data