CVE-2000-0112
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe default installation of Debian GNU/Linux uses an insecure Master Boot Record (MBR) which allows a local user to boot from a floppy disk during the installation.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe default Debian GNU/Linux installation uses an insecure Master Boot Record (MBR) that does not prevent booting from removable media. This allows a local user to boot from a floppy disk during the installation process, potentially bypassing security controls and gaining unauthorized access to the system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.0= 2.1= 2.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Debian versionRun 'cat /etc/debian_version' or 'lsb_release -a' to get the exact Debian version numberAffected if Version is 2.0, 2.1, or 2.2 (the affected versions)
-
Inspect MBR for boot protectionUse 'dd if=/dev/hda bs=512 count=1 2>/dev/null | xxd' or 'sudo hexdump -C /dev/sda -n 512' to view the MBR first 512 bytes. Look for standard Debian MBR signature versus a protected MBR (such as LILO, GRUB, or third-party MBR protectors)Affected if The MBR shows a default/insecure Debian MBR pattern with no boot protection installed
-
Check for bootloader with MBR protectionRun 'ls -la /boot/' to see what bootloader is installed. Check if LILO or GRUB is present. Inspect '/etc/lilo.conf' or '/boot/grub/menu.lst' for MBR protection settingsAffected if No bootloader with MBR protection is configured, or the system relies on default MBR
-
Verify boot device restrictionsCheck BIOS boot order configuration through 'dmidecode' if available, or inspect '/proc/bootp' or system documentation. On running systems, check if floppy drive is accessible at boot: 'ls /dev/fd0' or 'cat /proc/sys/dev/cdrom/info'Affected if Floppy boot capability is enabled in BIOS or no boot restrictions are configured
A defender is affected if running Debian 2.0, 2.1, or 2.2 with an unpatched default MBR that allows booting from removable media like floppy disks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataSecure the MBR by writing a protected/secure MBR and configuring BIOS to boot only from the hard drive, disabling floppy boot capability.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,744.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2000-0112 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2000-0112 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data