Mx2800Hardware / appliance · Adtran

CVE-2000-0292

MEDIUM · 5.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2000-04-19
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The Adtran MX2800 M13 Multiplexer allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a ping flood to the Ethernet interface, which causes the device to crash.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The Adtran MX2800 M13 Multiplexer suffers from a denial-of-service vulnerability where a ping flood (ICMP flood) directed at the Ethernet interface causes the device to crash. The device lacks proper rate limiting or input validation to handle excessive ICMP traffic, leading to a complete service interruption.

MitigationImplement network-level filtering (firewall or upstream network device) to rate-limit or block unsolicited ICMP traffic directed at the multiplexer. If the device firmware supports it, disable ICMP echo responses on the Ethernet interface.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Mx2800Hardware / appliance
Affected:= m13

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the device model
    Log into the device CLI or check hardware labeling to confirm the exact model is Adtran MX2800 M13 Multiplexer
    Affected if The device is an Adtran MX2800 M13 multiplexer running firmware version m13
  2. Check the firmware version
    Use the device's command-line interface (typically via console or telnet/ssh) and run the command to display firmware version, such as 'show version' or 'show system'
    Affected if The firmware version displayed is 'm13' or falls within the affected version range
  3. Verify ICMP echo response is enabled
    Check the device configuration for ICMP echo settings using commands like 'show ip interface' or 'show icmp' to see if ping responses are permitted on the Ethernet interface
    Affected if ICMP echo responses are enabled and allowed on the Ethernet interface with no filtering configured
  4. Confirm no ICMP rate limiting is configured
    Examine the device's access control or traffic management configuration using commands like 'show access-list' or 'show rate-limit' to see if any ICMP rate limiting or traffic policing is applied
    Affected if No ICMP-specific rate limiting, traffic shaping, or access list filtering is configured for inbound ICMP traffic
  5. Test ICMP traffic handling (optional passive check)
    Observe network traffic to the device using a network analyzer or monitoring tool to verify how the device processes ICMP packets; do not actively ping flood as that would cause the very DoS you are testing for
    Affected if The device processes all incoming ICMP packets without throttling or drop policies

You are affected if you have an Adtran MX2800 M13 multiplexer with firmware version m13 where ICMP echo responses are enabled and no rate limiting or filtering is configured for ICMP traffic.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement network-level filtering (firewall or upstream network device) to rate-limit or block unsolicited ICMP traffic directed at the multiplexer. If the device firmware supports it, disable ICMP echo responses on the Ethernet interface.

Fix this in Mx2800 Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,420
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2000-0292 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2000-0292 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data