ThttpdWeb server / proxy · Acme Labs

CVE-2000-0359

HIGH · 10.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2000-10-20
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Buffer overflow in Trivial HTTP (THTTPd) allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service or execute arbitrary commands via a long If-Modified-Since header.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Buffer overflow vulnerability in THTTPd's handling of the If-Modified-Since HTTP header allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service or potentially execute arbitrary commands via a specially crafted long header value.

MitigationUpgrade to a patched version of THTTPd that addresses this vulnerability, or implement an HTTP gateway/filter to enforce length limits on the If-Modified-Since header.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
ThttpdWeb server / proxy
Affected:= 1.90a= 1.95= 2.0= 2.0.1= 2.0.2= 2.0.3= 2.0.4

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if THTTPd is running
    Run 'ps aux | grep thttpd' or check for processes listening on HTTP port 80
    Affected if THTTPd process is found running on the system
  2. Determine the THTTPd version
    Run 'thttpd -v' or 'thttpd -V' to display version information, or check the binary with 'httpd -v' if renamed
    Affected if The displayed version matches any of these: 1.90a, 1.95, 2.0, 2.0.1, 2.0.2, 2.0.3, or 2.0.4
  3. Verify HTTP service is accessible
    Confirm the THTTPd service is accepting HTTP connections by making a request with 'curl -I http://localhost/' or checking if port 80 is listening
    Affected if The service is reachable and responding to HTTP requests, exposing the If-Modified-Since header handling to network clients
  4. Check for the If-Modified-Since header processing
    Send a curl request with a long If-Modified-Since header: 'curl -H "If-Modified-Since: [long-value]" http://localhost/'
    Affected if The server processes the If-Modified-Since header and the request completes without error (meaning the buffer overflow condition exists without triggering a crash)

A system is affected if THTTPd version 1.90a, 1.95, 2.0, 2.0.1, 2.0.2, 2.0.3, or 2.0.4 is running and accessible via HTTP, as the buffer overflow in If-Modified-Since header processing can be triggered by a specially crafted long header value.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to a patched version of THTTPd that addresses this vulnerability, or implement an HTTP gateway/filter to enforce length limits on the If-Modified-Since header.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

THTTPD 2.01 or later stable release

  1. 1. Identify current THTTPD version by running 'thttpd -V' or checking the package manager
  2. 2. Stop the THTTPD service before upgrading
  3. 3. Obtain THTTPD version 2.01 or later from the official source (acme.com/software/thttpd/)
  4. 4. Install the upgraded THTTPD package using appropriate package management commands for your system
  5. 5. Verify the installation succeeded by checking 'thttpd -V' shows version 2.01 or higher
  6. 6. Restart the THTTPD service
  7. 7. Test that the web server responds normally and the If-Modified-Since header is properly handled
Caveat Minimal risk - THTTPD 2.01 is a stable release with bug fixes; ensure any custom configurations are backed up before upgrade

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Thttpd Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,980
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,168.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2000-0359 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2000-0359 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data