Openview Network Node ManagerApplication · Hp

CVE-2000-0558

HIGH · 10.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2000-06-06
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Buffer overflow in HP Openview Network Node Manager 6.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via the Alarm service (OVALARMSRV) on port 2345.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Buffer overflow vulnerability in HP Openview Network Node Manager 6.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands through the Alarm service (OVALARMSRV) listening on port 2345. The overflow occurs due to insufficient bounds checking in the alarm handling functionality, enabling complete system compromise.

MitigationApply HP security patches for this vulnerability; if patches are unavailable for this older version, upgrade to a supported version of HP Openview NNM or implement network segmentation to restrict unauthorized access to port 2345.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Openview Network Node ManagerApplication
Affected:= 6.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify HP OpenView NNM installation version
    Locate and inspect the HP OpenView Network Node Manager installation directory, typically found under /opt/OV or C:\Program Files\HP OpenView. Check for version files or use the ovstatus command if available to display the installed version.
    Affected if The installed version is HP OpenView Network Node Manager 6.1 exactly.
  2. Verify OVALARMSRV service is running
    Check for the OVALARMSRV process using system utilities such as ps on Unix/Linux systems or Task Manager/Tasklist on Windows. This service is the Alarm service component of HP OpenView NNM.
    Affected if The OVALARMSRV process is active and running on the system.
  3. Confirm port 2345 is listening
    Use network inspection tools such as netstat, ss, or nmap to verify that port 2345 is in a LISTEN or OPEN state on the server where HP OpenView NNM is installed.
    Affected if Port 2345 is open and listening, indicating the Alarm service is accessible.
  4. Assess network exposure of the service
    Determine if port 2345 is accessible from network segments outside the trusted internal network by reviewing firewall rules, ACLs, or performing a port scan from an external vantage point.
    Affected if Port 2345 is reachable from untrusted network segments, exposing the vulnerable service to remote attackers.

A system is affected if it runs HP OpenView Network Node Manager version 6.1 with the OVALARMSRV service listening on port 2345 and that port is network-accessible to untrusted parties.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply HP security patches for this vulnerability; if patches are unavailable for this older version, upgrade to a supported version of HP Openview NNM or implement network segmentation to restrict unauthorized access to port 2345.

Fix this in Openview Network Node Manager Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2000-0558 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2000-0558 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data