Internet Information ServerApplication · Microsoft

CVE-2000-1090

MEDIUM · 5.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2001-02-12
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Microsoft IIS for Far East editions 4.0 and 5.0 allows remote attackers to read source code for parsed pages via a malformed URL that uses the lead-byte of a double-byte character.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Microsoft IIS 4.0 and 5.0 Far East editions contain an information disclosure vulnerability where malformed URLs utilizing the lead-byte of a double-byte character cause the server to return unparsed source code (e.g., ASP page source) instead of executing the server-side scripts.

MitigationApply Microsoft security patches for this vulnerability. If patches are unavailable for these legacy systems, consider upgrading to a supported IIS version or implementing URL filtering to block malformed double-byte character sequences.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Internet Information ServerApplication
Affected:= 4.0= 5.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
None
Availability
None

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify IIS version
    Run 'iisweb.vbs -s W3SVC' or check the version from IIS Manager, or query the registry key HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\W3SVC\Parameters\MajorVersion (value 4 for IIS 4.0, value 5 for IIS 5.0)
    Affected if Version equals 4.0 or 5.0
  2. Confirm Far East edition installation
    Check the IIS installation language by examining the system locale settings or the IIS metabase for language pack indicators. On Far East systems (Japanese, Chinese, Korean Windows), the MUI or language packs for IIS would be present.
    Affected if Running a Japanese, Chinese, or Korean language version of Windows Server with IIS 4.0 or 5.0 installed
  3. Verify server is reachable
    Attempt to access the IIS server over HTTP/HTTPS using a browser or curl command to confirm it is responding to requests.
    Affected if The server is running and accessible on the network
  4. Test for double-byte URL handling
    Send a request to an existing ASP page using a URL that includes a double-byte character sequence where the lead byte is crafted (for example, a URL with %XX patterns that mimic invalid double-byte sequences). Compare the response to the expected parsed output.
    Affected if The server returns unparsed ASP source code or discloses file contents instead of executing the script

The environment is affected if IIS version 4.0 or 5.0 is running on a Far East edition of Windows and the server responds to malformed double-byte URL sequences by returning source code instead of executed output.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply Microsoft security patches for this vulnerability. If patches are unavailable for these legacy systems, consider upgrading to a supported IIS version or implementing URL filtering to block malformed double-byte character sequences.

Fix this in Internet Information Server Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2000-1090 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2000-1090 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data