BackupApplication · Symantec Veritas

CVE-2001-0107

MEDIUM · 5.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2001-03-12
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Veritas Backup agent on Linux allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service by establishing a connection without sending any data, which causes the process to hang.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The Veritas Backup Agent on Linux contains a denial-of-service vulnerability where establishing a TCP connection without transmitting any data causes the agent process to hang. This indicates the agent lacks proper connection timeout or idle connection handling mechanisms, causing it to block indefinitely on unused connections.

MitigationApply vendor patches from Veritas for this vulnerability, or implement network-level access controls (firewall rules/ACLs) to restrict which hosts can connect to the backup agent port.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
BackupApplication
Affected:= 4.5

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if Veritas Backup Agent is installed
    Search for Veritas Backup Agent processes or binaries on the Linux system using commands such as 'ps aux | grep -i veritas' or 'rpm -qa | grep -i veritas' if using RPM-based distributions
    Affected if The presence of any Veritas Backup Agent process or package indicates potential exposure
  2. Verify the installed version is 4.5
    Check the installed version of the Veritas Backup Agent using package management tools or by querying the binary version (for example, 'vrtsvxesd -version' or 'vxsf -version' if those commands exist, otherwise consult vendor documentation for version check method)
    Affected if Version 4.5 exactly matches the affected version for this CVE
  3. Confirm the backup agent service is running and listening on TCP ports
    Run 'netstat -tlnp' or 'ss -tlnp' to list listening TCP ports, then identify which port the Veritas Backup Agent is bound to
    Affected if The backup agent is actively listening on a TCP port and accepting connections
  4. Test for vulnerable connection handling behavior
    Establish a TCP connection to the backup agent port using a tool such as 'nc' or 'telnet' without transmitting any data, then observe if the connection remains open indefinitely without the agent closing it or timing out
    Affected if The TCP connection persists without the agent initiating a timeout or disconnect, indicating vulnerable behavior

The system is affected if Veritas Backup Agent version 4.5 is installed, running, and accepting TCP connections that do not trigger proper timeout or idle connection handling.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor patches from Veritas for this vulnerability, or implement network-level access controls (firewall rules/ACLs) to restrict which hosts can connect to the backup agent port.

Fix this in Backup Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2001-0107 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2001-0107 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data