CVE-2001-1154
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCyrus 2.0.15, 2.0.16, and 1.6.24 on BSDi 4.2, with IMAP enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (hang) using PHP IMAP clients.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCyrus IMAP server versions 2.0.15, 2.0.16, and 1.6.24 on BSDi 4.2 contain a denial of service vulnerability when IMAP is enabled. Remote attackers can cause the server to hang by connecting using PHP IMAP clients.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.6.24= 2.0.15= 2.0.16= 4.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Cyrus IMAP server versionRun 'cyrus --version' or check the installed package version using the system package manager (e.g., 'rpm -q cyrus-imapd' or 'dpkg -l cyrus-imapd')Affected if The version is exactly 1.6.24, 2.0.15, or 2.0.16
-
Verify the operating systemRun 'uname -a' or check '/etc/os-release' to identify the BSD variant and versionAffected if The system is BSDi 4.2 (BSDi BSD/OS 4.2)
-
Confirm IMAP service is enabledCheck if the IMAP daemon is running and accepting connections - look for 'imapd' or 'cyrus-imapd' processes (e.g., 'ps aux | grep imapd') and check configuration in '/etc/cyrus.conf' or '/etc/imapd.conf'Affected if IMAP is enabled and the service is running or configured to start
-
Check for PHP IMAP extension presenceIf PHP is installed, verify whether the PHP IMAP extension is loaded by checking php.ini or running 'php -m | grep imap'Affected if PHP with the IMAP extension is installed and may be used to connect to the Cyrus IMAP server
You are affected if you are running any of the exact versions 1.6.24, 2.0.15, or 2.0.16 of Cyrus IMAP Server on BSDi 4.2 with IMAP enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to a current supported version of Cyrus IMAP or migrate to a modern mail server solution, as BSDi 4.2 and these Cyrus versions are long obsolete.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation24.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $15,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2001-1154 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2001-1154 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data