3cr29223Hardware / appliance · 3com

CVE-2001-1293

MEDIUM · 5.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2001-09-26
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Buffer overflow in web server of 3com HomeConnect Cable Modem External with USB (#3CR29223) allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a long HTTP request.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the embedded web server of the 3Com HomeConnect Cable Modem External (3CR29223). The overflow is triggered by sending an excessively long HTTP request to the web server, which causes the device to crash and result in a denial of service.

MitigationSince this is a legacy consumer cable modem from 2001 likely beyond vendor support, practical mitigations include network isolation to restrict access to the device's management interface, or replacement with a current, supported device if the modem remains in production use.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
3cr29223Hardware / appliance
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if 3CR29223 device is on the network
    Scan your network for devices with MAC vendor prefix 00:04:5A (3Com) or perform an inventory check of network-connected hardware. Look for a cable modem matching the 3Com HomeConnect Cable Modem External model 3CR29223.
    Affected if The device with model number 3CR29223 is present on the network
  2. Confirm the device model number
    Access the device management interface via its IP address (typically 192.168.100.1 for cable modems) through a web browser, or check the physical device label for model number 3CR29223.
    Affected if The device identifies itself as 3Com HomeConnect Cable Modem External 3CR29223
  3. Check if the embedded web server is running
    Attempt to access the device's web interface by navigating to its IP address over HTTP (port 80). If a login or status page loads, the web server is active.
    Affected if The device web interface responds to HTTP requests, indicating the embedded web server is running
  4. Verify the device is powered on and operational
    Ping the device's IP address or attempt to access the web interface. If the device responds, it is currently powered on and the vulnerable service could be targeted.
    Affected if The device responds to network requests, meaning the vulnerable web server could be exploited for denial of service

If the 3Com HomeConnect Cable Modem External (3CR29223) is present on the network with its web interface accessible, the environment is affected by this vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Since this is a legacy consumer cable modem from 2001 likely beyond vendor support, practical mitigations include network isolation to restrict access to the device's management interface, or replacement with a current, supported device if the modem remains in production use.

Fix this in 3cr29223 Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2001-1293 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2001-1293 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data