Lotus Domino ServerApplication · Ibm

CVE-2002-0037

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v2.0 Published 2002-04-22
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Lotus Domino Servers 5.x, 4.6x, and 4.5x allows attackers to bypass the intended Reader and Author access list for a document's object via a Notes API call (NSFDbReadObject) that directly accesses the object.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Lotus Domino Servers 5.x, 4.6x, and 4.5x contain an access control bypass vulnerability where the Notes API call NSFDbReadObject allows attackers to directly access document objects without enforcing the Reader and Author access list restrictions. This enables unauthorized users to read documents they should not have permission to access.

MitigationUpgrade to a supported, patched version of Lotus Domino Server. For legacy systems that cannot be upgraded, consider network segmentation to limit exposure and implement additional application-layer access controls.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Lotus Domino ServerApplication
Affected:= 4.5= 4.6= 5

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed Lotus Domino Server version
    Check the server version through the Domino Administrator client, the server's notes.ini file, or by querying the server's HTTP/DAOS administrative endpoints. Common locations include the Program directory where Domino is installed or checking the 'Server' document in the Domino Directory.
    Affected if The installed version matches 4.5.x, 4.6.x, or any 5.x release (including 5.0.x through 5.0.x).
  2. Verify the Domino server is network-accessible
    Confirm the server is running and accessible over the network. This can be done by attempting to connect to the Domino server via its HTTP port (typically 80 or 443), LDAP (389/636), or the Notes RPC port (1352). Use network scanning tools or telnet to test connectivity.
    Affected if The server is accessible over the network and responds to Notes/Domino protocol requests.
  3. Determine if the NSFDbReadObject API is accessible
    This is a Notes API function that can be called remotely. Check if the Domino server permits direct API calls or if there are custom database applications that utilize this API. Review any custom LotusScript or C API applications deployed on the server that might invoke NSFDbReadObject.
    Affected if The server hosts databases or applications that invoke the NSFDbReadObject API call without proper ACL enforcement.
  4. Review database access control lists (ACLs)
    Examine the Reader and Author fields in the ACL settings of sensitive databases. The vulnerability allows bypassing these restrictions. Check if databases have explicitly defined Reader names/groups or if they rely solely on default ACL settings.
    Affected if Databases contain sensitive documents with Reader/Author access restrictions that could be bypassed through direct API access.

You are affected if your Lotus Domino Server version is 4.5.x, 4.6.x, or any 5.x release, the server is network-accessible, and it hosts databases with Reader/Author access controls that could be circumvented via the NSFDbReadObject API call.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to a supported, patched version of Lotus Domino Server. For legacy systems that cannot be upgraded, consider network segmentation to limit exposure and implement additional application-layer access controls.

Fix this in Lotus Domino Server Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation24.0 h
  • Testing16.0 h
  • Review / QA8.0 h
56.0 hours of engineering $9,760
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $15,616.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2002-0037 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2002-0037 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data