CVE-2002-0743
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedmail and mailx in AIX 4.3.3 core dump when called with a very long argument, an indication of a buffer overflow.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · low confidenceThe mail and mailx utilities in AIX 4.3.3 contain a buffer overflow vulnerability triggered by supplying an excessively long argument, causing a core dump and indicating potential for arbitrary code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 4.3.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify AIX versionRun 'oslevel' or 'uname -a' to determine the installed AIX versionAffected if The system is running AIX 4.3.3 specifically
-
Confirm mail utility presenceCheck if the mail or mailx binary exists using 'which mail' or 'ls -la /usr/bin/mail*'Affected if The mail or mailx utility is installed on the system
-
Identify mail utility versionRun 'mail -v' or 'mailx -v' to display version information, or use 'lslpp -l' to list installed filesets related to mailAffected if The installed mail utility version matches AIX 4.3.3 built-in version
-
Test for oversized argument handlingAs a non-privileged user, attempt to trigger the overflow with an excessively long argument such as 'mail -s $(python3 -c "print("A"*10000)")' recipient' and observe if a core dump is generatedAffected if The command triggers a core dump or crashes, indicating the vulnerability is present
The system is affected only if it is running AIX 4.3.3 and has the vulnerable mail/mailx utility installed, as the buffer overflow only manifests when an excessively long argument is supplied to the mail command in this specific version.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataSince AIX 4.3.3 is a legacy system no longer supported, migrate to a supported AIX version or use alternative mail utilities; if continued use is required, restrict access to the mail command and consider input validation wrappers.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2002-0743 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2002-0743 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data