File Transfer ManagerApplication · Microsoft

CVE-2002-0978

MEDIUM · 5.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2002-09-24
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Microsoft File Transfer Manager (FTM) ActiveX control before 4.0 allows remote attackers to upload or download arbitrary files to arbitrary locations via a man-in-the-middle attack with modified TGT and TGN parameters in a call to the "Persist" function.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Microsoft File Transfer Manager (FTM) ActiveX control before version 4.0 contains a vulnerability in the Persist function where attackers can manipulate TGT and TGN parameters during file transfers, enabling a man-in-the-middle attacker to upload or download arbitrary files to arbitrary locations on the victim's system.

MitigationUpgrade Microsoft File Transfer Manager to version 4.0 or later, and implement TLS/SSL encryption for all FTM communications to prevent MITM attacks.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
File Transfer ManagerApplication
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Partial
Availability
None

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate File Transfer Manager installation
    Search for ftn管理 or ftm*.dll files on the system, typically found in Windows\System32 or application directories. Also check for MSFTQMS, GenericThumbnail or similar ActiveX CLSIDs in registry under HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID
    Affected if FTM ActiveX control DLL files are present on the system and the version is below 4.0.0.0
  2. Check FTM ActiveX control version
    Right-click the FTM DLL file (such as ftn管理.exe, MSFTQM.dll, or similar FTM components), select Properties, then check the File Version field. Alternatively, query the ActiveX control version via registry under the installed CLSID for the FTM component
    Affected if The file version is lower than 4.0.0.0 or the version field is empty/unavailable indicating a pre-4.0 release
  3. Identify applications using FTM
    Review installed Microsoft applications that historically used FTM (Microsoft Office updates, MSDN subscriptions, Windows Update components). Check registry keys under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Setup for FTM-related entries, or examine running processes for ftn管理.exe
    Affected if Applications utilizing the vulnerable FTM ActiveX control are installed and actively use the Persist function for file transfers
  4. Inspect network traffic configuration
    Capture and analyze network traffic from the FTM component using a packet sniffer to observe if file transfers occur over unencrypted channels. Check if TLS/SSL is enforced in any FTM configuration files or registry settings under the FTM component keys
    Affected if FTM file transfers are transmitted over unencrypted connections without TLS/SSL protection, allowing MITM manipulation of TGT and TGN parameters

The system is affected if Microsoft File Transfer Manager ActiveX control version below 4.0 is installed and used for file transfers, especially over unencrypted network connections where the Persist function can be exploited.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade Microsoft File Transfer Manager to version 4.0 or later, and implement TLS/SSL encryption for all FTM communications to prevent MITM attacks.

Fix this in File Transfer Manager Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,560
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,096.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2002-0978 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2002-0978 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data