Vpn ClientApplication · Cisco

CVE-2002-1104

MEDIUM · 5.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2002-10-04
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cisco Virtual Private Network (VPN) Client software 2.x.x and 3.x before 3.0.5 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via TCP packets with source and destination ports of 137 (NETBIOS).

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Cisco VPN Client versions 2.x and 3.x before 3.0.5 contains a denial of service vulnerability where specially crafted TCP packets with both source and destination ports set to 137 (NETBIOS) can cause the client software to crash.

MitigationUpgrade to Cisco VPN Client version 3.0.5 or later. Additionally, network-level filtering to block TCP port 137 traffic can provide defense-in-depth protection.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Vpn ClientApplication
Affected:= 2.0= 3.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check installed Cisco VPN Client version
    Open Windows Control Panel > Programs and Features (or Run > appwiz.cpl), find Cisco VPN Client in the list and note the version. Alternatively, check the About dialog in the VPN Client software or inspect the executable file properties of vpnclient.exe in the installation directory.
    Affected if Version is 2.0, 3.0, or any 2.x/3.x version earlier than 3.0.5
  2. Verify if NETBIOS over TCP/IP is enabled
    On the Windows machine running the VPN Client, open Network Connections > right-click the VPN adapter > Properties > double-click Internet Protocol (TCP/IP) > click Advanced > go to the WINS tab and check if 'Enable NETBIOS over TCP/IP' is selected.
    Affected if NETBIOS over TCP/IP is enabled on the VPN adapter (the vulnerability requires NETBIOS port 137 traffic to reach the client)
  3. Check VPN client configuration for NETBIOS settings
    Inspect the VPN Client profile configuration files (.pcf files) for entries related to 'NetBIOS' or 'EnableMSNetBIOS'. These are typically located in the profiles directory under the VPN Client installation folder.
    Affected if NETBIOS support is enabled in the VPN profile configuration
  4. Monitor for port 137 TCP traffic
    Use Windows Firewall logging, a network sniffer (such as Wireshark), or the VPN Client's diagnostic logs to observe whether incoming TCP packets with both source and destination port set to 137 are reaching the client.
    Affected if TCP port 137 traffic is allowed through to the VPN client interface (the vulnerability is triggered by such traffic)

You are affected if the Cisco VPN Client version is 2.0, 3.0, or any 2.x/3.x version prior to 3.0.5 AND NETBIOS over TCP/IP is enabled on the VPN adapter, allowing port 137 traffic to reach the client.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to Cisco VPN Client version 3.0.5 or later. Additionally, network-level filtering to block TCP port 137 traffic can provide defense-in-depth protection.

Fix this in Vpn Client Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,040
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2002-1104 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2002-1104 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data