ServicesApplication · Microsoft

CVE-2002-1140

MEDIUM · 5.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2002-10-11
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The Sun Microsystems RPC library Services for Unix 3.0 Interix SD, as implemented on Microsoft Windows NT4, 2000, and XP, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (service hang) via malformed packet fragments, aka "Improper parameter size check leading to denial of service."

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Sun Microsystems RPC library in Services for Unix 3.0 Interix on Windows NT4, 2000, and XP contains an improper parameter size check that allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via malformed RPC packet fragments, leading to service hang.

MitigationRestrict network access to systems running SFU 3.0 Interix RPC services, or disable the service if not required. If the service must remain active, apply any available vendor patches from Sun Microsystems.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
ServicesApplication
Affected:= 3.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Windows version
    Check if the system is running Windows NT4, Windows 2000, or Windows XP. Run 'winver' or check system properties.
    Affected if The system runs any of these three Windows versions.
  2. Check if Services for Unix 3.0 is installed
    Look for Microsoft Services for Unix 3.0 in the list of installed programs via Add/Remove Programs, or check the registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Services for Unix for version information.
    Affected if Services for Unix version 3.0 is installed on the system.
  3. Verify Interox RPC service status
    Check if the Interix RPC service (typically named 'Interix RPC Service' or similar) is installed and running. Use Services.msc or run 'sc query' to enumerate services containing 'Interix' or 'SFU'.
    Affected if The Interix RPC service is installed and running on the system.
  4. Check RPC listener configuration
    Verify that RPC listeners are enabled for Interix. This may require checking RPC configuration via 'rpccfg' or reviewing network listening services associated with SFU/Interix.
    Affected if Interix RPC listeners are bound to network interfaces and accepting connections.

The system is affected if it runs Windows NT4, 2000, or XP with Services for Unix 3.0 Interix installed and the Interix RPC service enabled and listening on the network.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Restrict network access to systems running SFU 3.0 Interix RPC services, or disable the service if not required. If the service must remain active, apply any available vendor patches from Sun Microsystems.

Fix this in Services Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2002-1140 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2002-1140 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data