CVE-2002-1360
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple SSH2 servers and clients do not properly handle strings with null characters in them when the string length is specified by a length field, which could allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly execute arbitrary code due to interactions with the use of null-terminated strings as implemented using languages such as C, as demonstrated by the SSHredder SSH protocol test suite.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMultiple SSH2 servers and clients fail to properly handle strings containing null characters when the string length is specified by a length field, causing a mismatch between length-specified parsing and null-terminated string handling as implemented in C. This discrepancy can lead to buffer overflows, denial of service, or potentially arbitrary code execution by remote attackers using specially crafted SSH protocol packets.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 12.0s= 12.0st= 12.1e= 12.1ea= 12.1t= 12.2= 12.2s= 12.2t= 1.0a_for_windows= 5.4.1= 3.4.6= 2.0= 0.48= 0.49= 0.53= 2.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed SSH client or server productCheck programs installed on the system that provide SSH functionality (clients like PuTTY, WinSCP, Fissh, Securenetterm, Shellguard, Secureshell; or SSH servers like Cisco iOS devices)Affected if The product matches one of the affected products: PuTTY versions 0.48, 0.49, or 0.53; WinSCP version 2.0.0; Fissh Ssh Client 1.0a_for_windows; Intersoft Securenetterm 5.4.1; Netcomposite Shellguard Ssh 3.4.6; Pragma Systems Secureshell 2.0; or Cisco iOS 12.0s, 12.0st, 12.1e, 12.1ea, 12.1t, 12.2, 12.
-
Retrieve the exact version number of the SSH productFor PuTTY: open PuTTY and check 'About' in the system menu, or check the executable properties. For WinSCP: go to Help > About. For Cisco iOS: use 'show version' command. For other products: check program properties, About dialog, or documentation.Affected if The version exactly matches one of the listed affected versions (0.48, 0.49, 0.53, 2.0.0, 1.0a_for_windows, 5.4.1, 3.4.6, 2.0, or any 12.0s/12.0st/12.1e/12.1ea/12.1t/12.2/12.2s/12.2t Cisco iOS release)
-
Verify SSH service is enabled and accessibleConfirm the SSH server is running (for Cisco iOS: check 'ip ssh' configuration) or the SSH client is actively used. The vulnerability is triggerable via specially crafted packets during SSH protocol communication.Affected if The product is running as an SSH server accepting connections, or is being used as an SSH client to connect to remote systems
You are affected if you have any of the specific product versions listed (PuTTY 0.48/0.49/0.53, WinSCP 2.0.0, Fissh 1.0a, Securenetterm 5.4.1, Shellguard 3.4.6, Secureshell 2.0, or Cisco iOS 12.0s-12.2t) and the SSH service is active or the client is in use.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate all SSH2 server and client implementations to patches or versions that properly handle length-prefixed strings without relying on null termination. If using custom SSH implementations, audit string handling code to ensure length fields are respected independently of null characters.
Upgrade to current stable versions of respective SSH clients (e.g., Putty 0.80+, WinSCP 6.x+)
- Identify all affected SSH clients (Putty, WinSCP, SecureNetTerm, Shellguard SSH, SecureShell, SSH Client for Windows) currently in use in your environment
- Uninstall or disable all vulnerable versions of these SSH clients
- Research the current supported version of each SSH client product (modern Putty, WinSCP, etc.)
- Download and install the latest stable version from the official vendor website
- Verify the newly installed version does not contain the null character string handling vulnerability
- Update organizational standards to prohibit use of legacy SSH client versions
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2002-1360 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2002-1360 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data