IrixOperating system · Sgi

CVE-2002-1584

HIGH · 10.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2002-12-27
Patch available
A vendor patch is available. No clean upgrade release — apply the published patch.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click Patch available

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Unknown vulnerability in the AUTH_DES authentication for RPC in Solaris 2.5.1, 2.6, and 7, SGI IRIX 6.5 to 6.5.19f, and possibly other platforms, allows remote attackers to gain privileges.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis

A detailed technical summary for this CVE is being prepared.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
IrixOperating system
Affected:= 6.5.1= 6.5.2= 6.5.2f= 6.5.2m= 6.5.3= 6.5.3f= 6.5.3m= 6.5.4= 6.5.4f= 6.5.4m= 6.5.5= 6.5.5f
SolarisOperating system
Affected:= 2.5.1= 2.6= 7.0
SunosOperating system
Affected:all versions= 5.5.1= 5.7

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Patch available Apply the vendor patch
Vendor patch patches.sgi.com →
Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Upgrade to supported OS versions: Solaris 10 or later, or IRIX 6.5.30 (if available) or migrate to a supported operating system. Note: These are legacy systems with no further vendor support.

  1. 1. Identify all systems running the affected Solaris (2.5.1, 2.6, 7.0) or IRIX (6.5.x) versions with RPC services enabled.
  2. 2. For SGI IRIX systems, download and apply the vendor patch from ftp://patches.sgi.com/support/free/security/advisories/20030402-01-P following SGI patch installation procedures.
  3. 3. For Solaris systems, check SunSolve (sunsolve.sun.com) for available patches for this vulnerability (CVE-2002-1584) and apply all recommended security patches.
  4. 4. If vendor patches are unavailable or systems cannot be patched, disable the AUTH_DES authentication mechanism in the RPC services (rpc.nisd, rpcbind, etc.) by modifying /etc/rc3.d/S71rpc or equivalent startup scripts.
  5. 5. Alternatively, disable or block RPC services at the network firewall level if they are not required for business operations.
  6. 6. Restrict network access to any remaining RPC services to trusted hosts only using TCP wrappers (/etc/hosts.allow, /etc/hosts.deny) or firewall rules.
Caveat Upgrading from Solaris 2.x/7.x to Solaris 10+ will require significant application re-testing and may require 32-bit to 64-bit application recompilation. IRIX upgrade paths are extremely limited as SGI discontinued IRIX support.

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

We can apply and verify the patch for your build — typical engagement from $1,950. Get the patch applied

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2002-1584 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2002-1584 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data