CVE-2002-1614
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBuffer overflow in HP Tru64 UNIX allows local users to execute arbitrary code via a long argument to /usr/bin/at.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer overflow in HP Tru64 UNIX /usr/bin/at allows local users to execute arbitrary code via a long argument, typically enabling local privilege escalation to root or elevated privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 10.20= 11.00= 11.04= 11.11= 11.22= 4.0f= 4.0g= 5.0a= 5.1= 5.1aCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the operating systemRun 'uname -a' or check /etc/os-release to confirm if the system is HP-UX or Tru64 UNIXAffected if The system is running HP-UX (any of versions 10.20, 11.00, 11.04, 11.11, 11.22) or Tru64 UNIX (any of versions 4.0f, 4.0g, 5.0a, 5.1, 5.1a)
-
Check installed HP-UX versionRun 'uname -a' or 'swlist -l bundle' to determine the exact HP-UX versionAffected if The version matches 10.20, 11.00, 11.04, 11.11, or 11.22
-
Check installed Tru64 versionRun 'uname -a' or check '/usr/sbin/sizer -v' to determine the Tru64 versionAffected if The version matches 4.0f, 4.0g, 5.0a, 5.1, or 5.1a
-
Verify /usr/bin/at existsRun 'ls -la /usr/bin/at' to confirm the at binary is presentAffected if The file /usr/bin/at exists on the system
-
Check /usr/bin/at permissions and ownershipRun 'ls -la /usr/bin/at' to inspect permissions. The vulnerability is exploitable if any untrusted local user can execute this binaryAffected if The at binary is readable and executable by untrusted local users (not restricted to root only)
A system is affected if it runs HP-UX versions 10.20 through 11.22 or Tru64 versions 4.0f through 5.1a and has the /usr/bin/at binary accessible to untrusted local users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply HP security patches for Tru64 UNIX; if patches are unavailable, restrict or disable /usr/bin/at access for untrusted local users.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2002-1614 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2002-1614 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data