CVE-2002-1834
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe default configuration of Xerox DocuTech 6110 and DocuTech 6115 allows remote attackers to connect to the web server and (1) submit print jobs directly into the "print now" queue or (2) read the scanner job history.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Xerox DocuTech 6110 and 6115 have a default configuration issue where the embedded web server allows unauthenticated remote access. Attackers can directly submit print jobs to the priority queue without authentication or view the scanner job history, exposing both integrity (unauthorized print submission) and confidentiality (job history disclosure) risks.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- None
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device modelAccess the device's web interface or check the physical label to confirm the model is Xerox DocuTech 6110 or 6115Affected if The device is a Xerox DocuTech 6110 or 6115 model
-
Verify the embedded web server is enabledAttempt to access the device's web interface via HTTP (typically port 80) using the device's IP addressAffected if The web interface is reachable and responds to requests without being blocked by network filters
-
Test unauthenticated access to the priority print queueSubmit a test print job to the device's priority queue endpoint without providing any credentialsAffected if The print job is accepted and queued without requiring authentication
-
Check for unauthenticated job history accessNavigate to the scanner job history or job status page on the web interface without logging inAffected if Job history or previous job details are visible without authentication
-
Confirm authentication is not requiredAttempt to access administrative or configuration functions on the web interface without providing credentialsAffected if Administrative features or device configuration pages are accessible without a login prompt
A user is affected if they have a Xerox DocuTech 6110 or 6115 device with the embedded web server enabled and accessible without authentication requirements.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataEnable authentication on the web interface and restrict network access to the device. If the web service is not required, disable it entirely.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,744.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2002-1834 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2002-1834 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data