CVE-2003-0016
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedApache before 2.0.44, when running on unpatched Windows 9x and Me operating systems, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service or execute arbitrary code via an HTTP request containing MS-DOS device names.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceApache HTTP Server before version 2.0.44 contains a vulnerability when running on unpatched Windows 9x and Me operating systems. Remote attackers can send HTTP requests containing MS-DOS device names (such as CON, PRN, AUX, NUL, and others) to cause a denial of service or potentially execute arbitrary code. This exploits how older Windows kernel versions handle requests to reserved device names.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.0.36= 2.0.37= 2.0.38= 2.0.39= 2.0.40= 2.0.41= 2.0.42= 2.0.43CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Windows OS versionRun 'winver' or check System Properties to confirm the operating system is Windows 95, Windows 98, or Windows Me. On the command line, 'ver' will show version strings like 'Windows 95' or 'Windows 98'.Affected if The operating system is Windows 9x (95/98) or Windows Me - this vulnerability only affects these older Windows versions.
-
Determine installed Apache versionRun 'httpd -v' or 'apache -v' from the Apache bin directory, or check the version displayed when starting Apache. Alternatively, check the ServerTokens or ServerSignature output in HTTP response headers.Affected if The Apache version is 2.0.36, 2.0.37, 2.0.38, 2.0.39, 2.0.40, 2.0.41, 2.0.42, or 2.0.43.
-
Confirm combined conditionsVerify that BOTH conditions are true: (1) the OS is Windows 9x/Me AND (2) Apache version is 2.0.36-2.0.43. Both must be present for exploitation.Affected if The server runs Apache 2.0.36-2.0.43 on Windows 9x/Me, making it vulnerable to malformed HTTP requests with MS-DOS device names.
If Apache HTTP Server versions 2.0.36 through 2.0.43 is installed on Windows 95, 98, or Me, the system is affected by this vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Apache HTTP Server to version 2.0.44 or later. For systems running Windows 9x/Me, strongly consider migrating to supported operating systems as these Windows versions are no longer supported and have known kernel-level vulnerabilities.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2003-0016 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- marc.info
- www.apacheweek.com
- www.kb.cert.org
- www.kb.cert.org
- www.securityfocus.com
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- lists.apache.org
- lists.apache.org
- lists.apache.org
- lists.apache.org
- lists.apache.org
- lists.apache.org
- lists.apache.org
- lists.apache.org
- lists.apache.org
- lists.apache.org
- lists.apache.org
- lists.apache.org
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2003-0016 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data