Windows NtOperating system · Microsoft

CVE-2003-0525

MEDIUM · 5.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2003-08-27
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The getCanonicalPath function in Windows NT 4.0 may free memory that it does not own and cause heap corruption, which allows attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via requests that cause a long file name to be passed to getCanonicalPath, as demonstrated on the IBM JVM using a long string to the java.io.getCanonicalPath Java method.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The getCanonicalPath function in Windows NT 4.0 contains a memory corruption vulnerability where it may free memory that it does not own when processing long file names, leading to heap corruption and denial of service via crash. This was demonstrated through the IBM JVM's java.io.getCanonicalPath method.

MitigationThis vulnerability affects Windows NT 4.0, an obsolete and unsupported operating system. The primary remediation is to migrate to a supported Windows version. Additionally, ensure any JVM implementations are updated to current, patched versions.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Windows NtOperating system
Affected:= 4.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the Windows operating system version
    Run 'winmsd' or check System Properties to determine the exact Windows version. On Windows NT 4.0, the OS name will display as 'Microsoft Windows NT' with version 4.0
    Affected if The system is running Windows NT version 4.0 specifically. This vulnerability does not affect later Windows versions such as 2000, XP, or Server 2003.
  2. Determine if Java is installed
    Check for the presence of Java installations by looking for 'java.exe' in system paths or checking Add/Remove Programs for IBM JVM or Sun Java entries
    Affected if IBM JVM or any Java 2 SDK implementation is installed on Windows NT 4.0, as the vulnerability was demonstrated through the IBM JVM's java.io.getCanonicalPath method.
  3. Check for applications using file path canonicalization
    Review application code or dependencies for usage of java.io.File.getCanonicalPath(), java.io.File.getCanonicalFile(), or equivalent native path resolution functions
    Affected if Any application on Windows NT 4.0 invokes the getCanonicalPath function with long file names that trigger the memory corruption.
  4. Verify Java security policy configuration
    Examine the Java security manager settings and policy files that control file operations. The vulnerability can be triggered through untrusted applets or applications performing file path operations
    Affected if Java applications with file system access permissions are running on an affected Windows NT 4.0 system.

A system is affected only if it is running Windows NT 4.0 specifically and executes Java code or other code paths that invoke the getCanonicalPath function with long file names, leading to heap corruption and potential denial of service.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

This vulnerability affects Windows NT 4.0, an obsolete and unsupported operating system. The primary remediation is to migrate to a supported Windows version. Additionally, ensure any JVM implementations are updated to current, patched versions.

Fix this in Windows Nt Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation40.0 h
  • Testing16.0 h
  • Review / QA8.0 h
72.0 hours of engineering $12,640
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $20,224.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2003-0525 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2003-0525 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data