CVE-2003-0784
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedFormat string vulnerability in tsm for the bos.rte.security fileset on AIX 5.2 allows remote attackers to gain root privileges via login, and local users to gain privileges via login, su, or passwd, with a username that contains format string specifiers.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA format string vulnerability exists in TSM (Tivoli Storage Manager) within the bos.rte.security fileset on AIX 5.2. Attackers can inject format string specifiers into usernames when authenticating via login, su, or passwd commands, allowing arbitrary code execution with root privileges. Remote unauthenticated attackers can exploit this for complete system compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 4.3.3= 5.1= 5.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify AIX versionRun 'oslevel -r' or 'bootinfo -r' to determine the installed AIX version numberAffected if Version is 433 (AIX 4.3.3), 510 (AIX 5.1), or 520 (AIX 5.2)
-
Check bos.rte.security fileset versionRun 'lslpp -l bos.rte.security' to list the installed version of the security filesetAffected if Fileset version is unpatched and corresponds to affected AIX versions listed above
-
Verify patch status for CVE-2003-0784Run 'instfix -iv | grep IY' (search for security fix) or contact IBM support to confirm if the fix for this CVE is appliedAffected if No security patch or PTF for CVE-2003-0784 is installed on the bos.rte.security fileset
-
Assess exposure to login/su/passwdCheck network exposure of authentication services: review /etc/security/login.cfg for remote login settings, check if telnet/rsh are enabled, and verify su command accessibilityAffected if Remote unauthenticated attackers can reach login, su, or passwd services over the network
System is affected if running unpatched AIX 4.3.3, 5.1, or 5.2 with an unpatched bos.rte.security fileset where login/su/passwd are network-accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the appropriate AIX security patch or PTF (Program Temporary Fix) for the bos.rte.security fileset. If patches are unavailable for the legacy AIX 5.2 environment, consider upgrading to a supported AIX version or implementing compensating controls such as restricting remote access and monitoring authentication logs for anomalous username patterns.
Upgrade to a later supported AIX release (AIX 5.3 TL or AIX 6.1/7.1) which are still supported by IBM and contain security fixes; AIX 4.3.3, 5.1, and 5.2 are end-of-life.
- 1. Identify the exact PTF (Program Temporary Fix) number for this vulnerability by searching IBM's support website or contacting IBM Support.
- 2. For AIX 5.2: Apply the security patch for APAR (Authorized Program Analysis Report) IY45718 or subsequent security PTFs for the bos.rte.security fileset.
- 3. For AIX 5.1: Apply the corresponding security patch for the bos.rte.security fileset addressing this format string vulnerability.
- 4. For AIX 4.3.3: Apply the applicable security patch for the bos.rte.security fileset.
- 5. After patching, verify the fix by checking the bos.rte.security fileset version with: `lslpp -l bos.rte.security`
- 6. Restart any affected services (login, su, passwd) or reboot the system to ensure the patched code is active.
- 7. Test that login, su, and passwd functions work correctly after the patch is applied.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2003-0784 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2003-0784 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data