CVE-2003-0821
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMicrosoft Excel 97, 2000, and 2002 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a spreadsheet with a malicious XLM (Excel 4) macro that bypasses the macro security model.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in Microsoft Excel 97, 2000, and 2002 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a spreadsheet containing a malicious XLM (Excel 4) macro that bypasses the macro security model built into those versions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 97= 98= 2000= 2002= 2001= 2002= 2003= 2004CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Microsoft Excel versionOpen Excel, click Help > About Microsoft Excel, or run 'winver' or check Add/Remove Programs for Microsoft Excel versionAffected if Version is 97, 2000, or 2002 (these are the vulnerable versions)
-
Verify macro security settingsIn Excel, go to Tools > Macro > Security (or File > Options > Trust Center > Trust Center Settings > Macro Settings)Affected if Macro security is set to Low, Medium, or Disabled (rather than High or Disable all without notification)
-
Confirm XLM macro execution capabilityAttempt to open a test spreadsheet with an XLM macro, or check if Excel can process Excel 4.0 macro sheets (file extension .XLW)Affected if Excel can execute XLM macros and the macro security model does not block them
You are affected if you are running Excel version 97, 2000, or 2002 with macro execution enabled, as the vulnerability allows XLM macros to bypass the built-in security model.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to a patched or current version of Microsoft Excel. Alternatively, disable macro execution or implement aggressive macro blocking at the enterprise level for legacy systems that cannot be upgraded.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,712.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2003-0821 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2003-0821 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data