Internet Transaction ServerApplication · Sap

CVE-2003-1037

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v2.0 Published 2004-04-15
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 6.20_pl7 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Format string vulnerability in the WGate component for SAP Internet Transaction Server (ITS) allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a high "trace level."

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A format string vulnerability exists in the WGate component of SAP Internet Transaction Server (ITS) that allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via user-supplied input being passed as a format string to vulnerable functions when the trace level is set to high.

MitigationApply SAP security patches for the ITS WGate component or disable high trace level logging until patching can be completed.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Internet Transaction ServerApplication
Affected:<= 4.6_pl463<= 6.10_pl30<= 6.20_pl7

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify SAP ITS installation and version
    Locate the SAP Internet Transaction Server installation directory and check the version file or executable properties. Common locations include /sapmnt/<SID>/its or SAP ITS directories under the SAP system root. Look for version information in ITS-specific binaries or release files.
    Affected if The installed version is 4.6 with patch level 463 or lower, 6.10 with patch level 30 or lower, or 6.20 with patch level 7 or lower.
  2. Confirm WGate component is active
    Check if the WGate web gateway component of SAP ITS is deployed and enabled. This is typically a web service or CGI/ISAPI module handling HTTP requests to the ITS. Verify the WGate executable or DLL is present and the ITS web portal is accessible.
    Affected if The WGate component is installed and running, as this is the vulnerable component containing the format string flaw.
  3. Check ITS trace level configuration
    Examine the ITS WGate configuration files or registry settings for the trace level parameter. The trace level is typically configured in the WGate configuration (wgate.ini, itsmon.ini, or similar) or via SAP ITS administration settings. Look for settings like 'TraceLevel' or 'tracelevel' set to value 3 (high) or maximum.
    Affected if The trace level is set to high (typically level 3 or maximum), which enables the vulnerable code path that processes user input as a format string.
  4. Verify external-facing ITS portal
    Determine if the WGate web portal is exposed to network traffic or accessible externally. Check web server configurations (IIS, Apache, SAP Web Dispatcher) for ITS-related virtual directories or CGI mappings that route traffic to WGate.
    Affected if The ITS WGate is network-accessible, as this is required for remote attackers to exploit the format string vulnerability.

You are affected if you have a vulnerable SAP ITS version (4.6_pl463 or lower, 6.10_pl30 or lower, 6.20_pl7 or lower) with the WGate component enabled and the trace level configured to high, and the portal is network-accessible.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 6.20_pl7
Interim mitigation

Apply SAP security patches for the ITS WGate component or disable high trace level logging until patching can be completed.

Fix this in Internet Transaction Server Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,570
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,512.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2003-1037 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2003-1037 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data