CVE-2004-0222
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple memory leaks in isakmpd in OpenBSD 3.4 and earlier allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory exhaustion) via certain ISAKMP packets, as demonstrated by the Striker ISAKMP Protocol Test Suite.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMultiple memory leaks exist in the isakmpd (ISAKMP daemon) in OpenBSD 3.4 and earlier. Remote attackers can send specially crafted ISAKMP packets that trigger uncontrolled memory allocation, eventually leading to memory exhaustion and denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 3.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify OpenBSD versionRun 'uname -r' or check /var/run/dmesg.boot for the OS release versionAffected if Version is 3.4 or earlier (e.g., 3.3, 3.2, 3.1, 3.0)
-
Confirm isakmpd is installedCheck for the presence of /usr/sbin/isakmpd or run 'which isakmpd'Affected if The isakmpd binary exists on the system
-
Determine if isakmpd is runningRun 'ps aux | grep isakmpd' or check for isakmpd processesAffected if The isakmpd daemon is currently running as a process
-
Check if isakmpd is listening on networkRun 'netstat -an | grep :500' or 'sockstat | grep isakmpd' to see if UDP port 500 is boundAffected if isakmpd is listening on UDP port 500 (the standard ISAKMP port), exposing it to network traffic
-
Monitor for memory issuesCheck system logs in /var/log/messages or use 'vmstat 1' to observe memory usage over time, look for isakmpd memory growthAffected if isakmpd process shows abnormally high or continuously increasing memory consumption
You are affected if running OpenBSD 3.4 or earlier with isakmpd enabled and exposed to network traffic, especially if the daemon exhibits excessive memory usage.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to a newer OpenBSD version or apply the isakmpd patch if available. For legacy systems, consider network segmentation to limit exposure to untrusted ISAKMP traffic.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2004-0222 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2004-0222 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data