WingateApplication · Qbik

CVE-2004-0578

MEDIUM · 5.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2004-12-06
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
WinGate 5.2.3 build 901 and 6.0 beta 2 build 942, and other versions such as 5.0.5, allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via leading slash (//) characters in a URL request to the wingate-internal directory.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

WinGate proxy server versions 5.0.5, 5.2.3 build 901, and 6.0 beta 2 build 942 contain a path traversal vulnerability in the wingate-internal web directory. Remote attackers can read arbitrary files on the server by using leading slash characters (//) in URL requests, which bypasses path sanity checks and allows directory traversal outside the intended wingate-internal directory.

MitigationUpgrade WinGate to a patched version beyond the vulnerable builds, or implement network-level access controls to restrict unauthorized access to the wingate-internal directory.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
WingateApplication
Affected:= 5.0.5= 5.2.3= 6.0_beta_2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
None
Availability
None

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm WinGate proxy server is installed and running
    Check running processes for WinGate-related services (wingate.exe, WinGate.exe, or similar) or check installed programs for Qbik WinGate
    Affected if WinGate is not installed or not running - the vulnerability does not apply
  2. Identify the installed WinGate version
    Use the program's built-in version information (help menu, about dialog, or command-line version flag) to determine the exact version number and build
    Affected if The installed version is 5.0.5, 5.2.3 build 901, or 6.0 beta 2 build 942 exactly as listed in the affected versions
  3. Verify the wingate-internal web interface is accessible
    Attempt to access the wingate-internal web directory via HTTP on the WinGate server port (commonly port 80 or 8080) using a browser or curl command
    Affected if The wingate-internal web directory responds to requests - the vulnerability can only be exploited if this interface is accessible
  4. Test for path traversal vulnerability
    Send an HTTP GET request to the wingate-internal directory using double slashes (//) followed by a known file path outside the web root, such as //windows/win.ini or //boot.ini, and observe if the file contents are returned
    Affected if The server returns the contents of files outside the wingate-internal directory, confirming the path traversal vulnerability is present

A user is affected if WinGate is installed with version 5.0.5, 5.2.3 build 901, or 6.0 beta 2 build 942 AND the wingate-internal web interface is accessible AND the path traversal test returns arbitrary file contents.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade WinGate to a patched version beyond the vulnerable builds, or implement network-level access controls to restrict unauthorized access to the wingate-internal directory.

Fix this in Wingate Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2004-0578 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2004-0578 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data