CVE-2004-0594
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe memory_limit functionality in PHP 4.x up to 4.3.7, and 5.x up to 5.0.0RC3, under certain conditions such as when register_globals is enabled, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by triggering a memory_limit abort during execution of the zend_hash_init function and overwriting a HashTable destructor pointer before the initialization of key data structures is complete.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidencePHP's memory_limit functionality in versions 4.x up to 4.3.7 and 5.x up to 5.0.0RC3 contains a memory corruption vulnerability. When register_globals is enabled, an attacker can trigger a memory_limit abort during zend_hash_init execution and overwrite a HashTable destructor pointer before key data structures are fully initialized, enabling arbitrary code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.0>= 4.0, < 4.3.7= 5.0.0= 2.0= 2.1= 2.0= b.11.00= b.11.11= b.11.22= b.11.23= 1.5= 2.0= 2.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check PHP versionRun 'php -v' or 'phpinfo()' to determine the installed PHP version numberAffected if Version is 4.0.0 through 4.3.7, or 5.0.0 through 5.0.0RC3 (including 5.0.0)
-
Locate PHP configuration fileFind php.ini - common paths are /etc/php.ini, /etc/httpd/conf/php.ini, or run 'php -i | grep "Loaded Configuration File"'Affected if The configuration file exists and can be read for the next check
-
Verify register_globals settingIn php.ini, look for 'register_globals = On' or check with 'php -i | grep register_globals'Affected if register_globals is set to On (enabled) in the active php.ini or at runtime
-
Confirm memory_limit configurationCheck if 'memory_limit' directive is set in php.ini (any value enables the vulnerable code path), verify with 'php -i | grep memory_limit'Affected if memory_limit is explicitly set to any value (even low values trigger the vulnerable abort condition)
You are affected if PHP version is 4.0.0-4.3.7 or 5.0.0-5.0.0RC3 AND register_globals is enabled, regardless of memory_limit value.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data4.3.7
Upgrade PHP to version 4.3.8 or later (PHP 4) or 5.0.1 or later (PHP 5). As a defense-in-depth measure, disable register_globals if still in use.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,288.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2004-0594 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- marc.info
- marc.info
- marc.info
- marc.info
- www.gentoo.org
- www.securityfocus.com
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- www.debian.org
- distro.conectiva.com.br
- lists.grok.org.uk
- www.debian.org
- www.mandrakesecure.net
- www.novell.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.trustix.org
- oval.cisecurity.org
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2004-0594 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data