CVE-2004-0669
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedLotus Domino 6.5.0 and 6.5.1, with IMAP enabled, allows remote authenticated users to change their quota by using the IMAP setquota command.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceLotus Domino 6.5.0 and 6.5.1 with IMAP enabled contains an authorization flaw where remote authenticated IMAP users can modify their own mailbox quota using the SETQUOTA command, bypassing intended administrative controls over storage limits.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 6.5.0= 6.5.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Lotus Domino versionLocate the Domino server program directory and check the version information (typically via domino.exe version or server console command like 'show server')Affected if The installed version is 6.5.0 or 6.5.1
-
Determine if IMAP service is enabledInspect Domino server configuration documents or notes.ini settings for IMAP service status (look for IMAP configuration in Server文档 or TCP/IP port settings)Affected if IMAP is enabled and listening on the server
-
Verify IMAP quota configuration existsCheck if IMAP quota settings are defined in the Domino IMAP configuration (typically found in the IMAP settings section of the server configuration document)Affected if IMAP quota management is configured on the server
-
Confirm user authentication method for IMAPReview Domino IMAP authentication settings to determine if remote users can authenticate to the IMAP serviceAffected if Remote authenticated IMAP users have access to the server
You are affected if your Domino installation is version 6.5.0 or 6.5.1 AND IMAP service is enabled, allowing remote authenticated users to bypass quota controls via SETQUOTA.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Lotus Domino to a version beyond 6.5.1 that contains the fix, or disable IMAP if not required, or implement network-level access controls restricting IMAP to trusted admin networks only.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2004-0669 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2004-0669 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data