Ftp ServerApplication · Argosoft

CVE-2004-1429

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v2.0 Published 2004-12-31
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 1.4.2.4 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
ArGoSoft FTP 1.4.2.4 and earlier does not limit the number of times that a bad password can be entered, which makes it easier for remote attackers to guess passwords via a brute force attack.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

ArGoSoft FTP Server versions 1.4.2.4 and earlier lacks protection against brute force authentication attacks. The server does not implement account lockout, rate limiting, or failed attempt tracking, allowing remote attackers to make unlimited password guesses against any user account.

MitigationImplement account lockout policies to temporarily disable accounts after a configurable number of failed login attempts, and add rate limiting to throttle repeated authentication attempts from the same source.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Ftp ServerApplication
Affected:<= 1.4.2.4= 1.4.1.1= 1.4.1.2= 1.4.1.3= 1.4.1.4= 1.4.1.5= 1.4.1.6= 1.4.1.7= 1.4.1.8= 1.4.1.9= 1.4.2= 1.4.2.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm ArGoSoft FTP Server is installed
    Check running processes for 'ArGoSoft' or check for the service listening on FTP port 21 (default). Use command: netstat -an | findstr ':21' or check Windows Services for ArGoSoft FTP Server.
    Affected if The server is running and responds to FTP connections on port 21.
  2. Identify installed version
    Check the version information of the ArGoSoft FTP Server installation. This may be found in the program's main window, in the About dialog, or in the program's installation directory. Compare the version number against the affected range: <= 1.4.2.4 or any of these specific versions: 1.4.1.1 through 1.4.2.1.
    Affected if The installed version matches any version listed in the affected products and versions.
  3. Verify account lockout policy is not configured
    Access the ArGoSoft FTP Server management interface or configuration settings. Look for any account lockout, account disabling, or failed login attempt threshold settings.
    Affected if No account lockout policy exists or is configurable in the server settings.
  4. Verify rate limiting is not implemented
    Examine the server's security or connection settings for any rate limiting, connection throttling, or login attempt frequency controls.
    Affected if No rate limiting or throttling mechanism is available or enabled.
  5. Verify failed attempt tracking is not present
    Check the server logs or security settings for any logging or tracking of failed authentication attempts.
    Affected if The server does not log or track failed login attempts.

You are affected if ArGoSoft FTP Server is running with a version in the affected range AND none of the brute force protections (account lockout, rate limiting, failed attempt tracking) are implemented.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 1.4.2.4
Interim mitigation

Implement account lockout policies to temporarily disable accounts after a configurable number of failed login attempts, and add rate limiting to throttle repeated authentication attempts from the same source.

Fix this in Ftp Server Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
7.0 hours of engineering $1,240
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2004-1429 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2004-1429 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data