CVE-2004-2069
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedsshd.c in OpenSSH 3.6.1p2 and 3.7.1p2 and possibly other versions, when using privilege separation, does not properly signal the non-privileged process when a session has been terminated after exceeding the LoginGraceTime setting, which leaves the connection open and allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (connection consumption).
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn OpenSSH 3.6.1p2 and 3.7.1p2 (and possibly other versions) with privilege separation enabled, the privileged monitor process fails to properly signal the unprivileged child process when a login session is terminated after exceeding the LoginGraceTime threshold. This leaves the network connection in an open but unusable state, allowing remote attackers to repeatedly trigger this condition and exhaust available connections (Denial of Service).
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.6.1p2= 3.7.1p2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed OpenSSH versionRun `sshd -v` or `sshd -V` to display the OpenSSH daemon version, or check your package manager for the installed openssh-server version.Affected if The version is exactly 3.6.1p2 or 3.7.1p2 (or a version within the 3.6.1 or 3.7.1 release family that has not been patched).
-
Verify privilege separation is enabledCheck the sshd configuration file (typically /etc/ssh/sshd_config) for the directive `UsePrivilegeSeparation`. Ensure it is not set to `no` or `noexec`.Affected if Privilege separation is enabled (the default setting), which is required for this vulnerability to be triggerable.
-
Confirm LoginGraceTime configurationCheck sshd_config for the `LoginGraceTime` directive. Run `grep LoginGraceTime /etc/ssh/sshd_config` to see the current value.Affected if LoginGraceTime is set to a non-zero value (the default is 120 seconds). A non-zero grace time allows attackers to trigger the condition by initiating connections and letting them time out.
-
Check for active SSH connections in hung stateRun `netstat -an | grep :22` or `ss -an | grep :22` to inspect connections on port 22. Look for connections in states such as ESTABLISHED or LAST_ACK that remain stuck for unusually long periods.Affected if There are multiple lingering SSH connections that appear stuck or unresponsive after the grace time has expired, indicating possible exploitation of this condition.
You are affected if you are running OpenSSH 3.6.1p2 or 3.7.1p2 with privilege separation enabled and a non-zero LoginGraceTime, and you observe stuck SSH connections.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade OpenSSH to a patched version (3.7.2 or later) that properly handles the inter-process signaling when LoginGraceTime expires. If immediate upgrade is not possible, consider reducing LoginGraceTime to limit exposure window, though upgrade is the definitive fix.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2004-2069 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- marc.info
- marc.info
- rhn.redhat.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- support.avaya.com
- support.avaya.com
- www.osvdb.org
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.vmware.com
- www.vmware.com
- www.vmware.com
- www.vmware.com
- www.vupen.com
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- oval.cisecurity.org
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2004-2069 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data