NetwareOperating system · Novell

CVE-2004-2105

MEDIUM · 5.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2004-12-31
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The webacc servlet in Novell NetWare Enterprise Web Server 5.1 and 6.0 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary .htt files via a full pathname in the error parameter.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The webacc servlet in Novell NetWare Enterprise Web Server 5.1 and 6.0 contains a path traversal vulnerability allowing remote attackers to read arbitrary .htt files by supplying a full pathname in the error parameter. This is a file disclosure issue resulting from insufficient input validation.

MitigationApply vendor patches if available; otherwise restrict or disable the webacc servlet, implement URL filtering at the network perimeter, or upgrade from legacy NetWare systems.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
NetwareOperating system
Affected:= 5.1= 6.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
None
Availability
None

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm NetWare Enterprise Web Server version
    Check system information or server documentation for the exact NetWare version (5.1 or 6.0) and verify Enterprise Web Server component is installed. Look in system inventory, NWCONFIG, or iManager for installed products.
    Affected if Version is NetWare 5.1 or 6.0 with Enterprise Web Server component present
  2. Identify if webacc servlet is enabled
    Check the servlet container configuration (typically in servlet.ini, servlet.xml, or through iManager) for the webacc servlet mapping. Look for servlet definition with name 'webacc' or path pattern '/servlet/webacc'.
    Affected if webacc servlet is registered and enabled in the servlet container configuration
  3. Verify .htt file handling is enabled
    Check if .htt file extension handlers are configured in the Enterprise Web Server configuration (httpd.cfg, .htaccess, or through consoleone/iManager). Look for HTT extension mapping to a handler.
    Affected if The server is configured to process .htt files through the webacc servlet or similar handler
  4. Test path traversal via error parameter
    If webacc is accessible, attempt a controlled request with error parameter pointing to a known .htt file path (e.g., /servlet/webacc?error=/path/to/sample.htt). Compare response against expected content or check for path traversal in server logs.
    Affected if The error parameter accepts and processes full filesystem paths to .htt files without proper sanitization

A system is affected if it runs Novell NetWare Enterprise Web Server version 5.1 or 6.0 with the webacc servlet enabled and .htt file handling configured, allowing path traversal through the error parameter to read arbitrary .htt files.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor patches if available; otherwise restrict or disable the webacc servlet, implement URL filtering at the network perimeter, or upgrade from legacy NetWare systems.

Fix this in Netware Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2004-2105 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2004-2105 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data