Web Wiz ForumsApplication · Webwiz

CVE-2004-2733

MEDIUM · 5.8 CVSS v2.0 Published 2004-12-31
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
67/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Web Wiz Forums 7.7a uses invalid logic to determine user privileges, which allows remote attackers to (1) block arbitrary IP addresses via pop_up_ip_blocking.asp or (2) modify topics via pop_up_topic_admin.asp.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Web Wiz Forums 7.7a contains an insecure direct object reference or broken access control vulnerability where the application uses invalid logic to determine user privileges. This allows remote attackers to bypass authorization checks in pop_up_ip_blocking.asp (to block arbitrary IP addresses) and pop_up_topic_admin.asp (to modify topics) without proper administrative authentication.

MitigationUpgrade to a patched version of Web Wiz Forums that properly validates user privileges before allowing administrative actions, or implement proper session-based authentication and role authorization checks on the affected ASP pages.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Web Wiz ForumsApplication
Affected:= 7.7

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
M
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed Web Wiz Forums version
    Check the version information in the forum's configuration files or footer/includes (commonly in version.asp, constants.asp, or the database). Look for version strings containing '7.7'.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 7.7 (or falls within the 7.7.x range if the vendor clarified broader affected versions).
  2. Locate the vulnerable ASP files on the server
    Search the web server directory for the presence of pop_up_ip_blocking.asp and pop_up_topic_admin.asp files in the forum's web root or admin directories.
    Affected if Both or either of these files exist in the forum installation directory.
  3. Verify access control on the vulnerable pages
    Attempt to access pop_up_ip_blocking.asp and pop_up_topic_admin.asp directly via HTTP request (for example: http://yourserver/forums/pop_up_ip_blocking.asp) without logging in or providing administrative credentials.
    Affected if The pages load and display functionality without requiring valid admin authentication or session cookies.
  4. Check for admin session tokens in requests
    Inspect the HTTP requests and responses when accessing these pages. Examine whether the application relies solely on client-side parameters, hidden fields, or weak cookie checks rather than server-validated session-based role verification.
    Affected if The application accepts requests without validating server-side session privileges, or allows admin actions based solely on predictable parameters.

A user is affected if they are running Web Wiz Forums version 7.7 with the vulnerable ASP files present and accessible without proper administrative authentication.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to a patched version of Web Wiz Forums that properly validates user privileges before allowing administrative actions, or implement proper session-based authentication and role authorization checks on the affected ASP pages.

Fix this in Web Wiz Forums Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2004-2733 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2004-2733 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data