Burning BookApplication · Woltlab

CVE-2005-0284

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v2.0 Published 2005-01-10
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
SQL injection vulnerability in addentry.php in Woltlab Burning Book 1.0 Gold, 1.1.1e, and possibly other versions, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the user-agent parameter.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

SQL injection vulnerability in addentry.php allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the user-agent HTTP header parameter, which is not properly sanitized before being used in a SQL query.

MitigationUpgrade to a patched version of Woltlab Burning Book if available; otherwise, refactor addentry.php to use parameterized queries/prepared statements instead of directly embedding the user-agent value in SQL statements.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Burning BookApplication
Affected:= 1.0_gold= 1.1.1e

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Woltlab Burning Book installation
    Search the web server file system for Woltlab Burning Book files, typically located in the web root directory. Look for directories containing 'burningbook' or 'wbb' in the name, and identify the main application files.
    Affected if The application is Woltlab Burning Book installed on the server
  2. Check addentry.php file existence
    Locate the addentry.php file within the Woltlab Burning Book installation directory. This file is typically found in the root or a script subdirectory of the application.
    Affected if The addentry.php file exists in the Woltlab Burning Book installation
  3. Determine the installed version
    Check the version identifier of Woltlab Burning Book. This is typically found in a version file, changelog, or within the main index.php file. Common version markers include '1.0_gold' or '1.1.1e'.
    Affected if The installed version is 1.0_gold or 1.1.1e specifically
  4. Verify web accessibility of addentry.php
    Confirm that addentry.php is accessible via HTTP/HTTPS requests from the web. This file processes form submissions including HTTP headers. Attempt to access it through a web browser or curl request to verify it handles requests.
    Affected if addentry.php is accessible and processes HTTP requests including the user-agent header
  5. Inspect SQL query handling in addentry.php
    Open addentry.php in a text editor and examine the code around line numbers that handle the user-agent HTTP header. Look for SQL queries that directly incorporate the user-agent value without sanitization or use of prepared statements.
    Affected if The code directly embeds the user-agent header value into SQL queries without using parameterized queries or input sanitization

A user is affected if they have Woltlab Burning Book version 1.0_gold or 1.1.1e installed with the addentry.php file accessible and the user-agent header being used directly in SQL queries without sanitization.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to a patched version of Woltlab Burning Book if available; otherwise, refactor addentry.php to use parameterized queries/prepared statements instead of directly embedding the user-agent value in SQL statements.

Fix this in Burning Book Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2005-0284 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2005-0284 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data