CVE-2005-1467
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnknown vulnerability in the NDPS dissector in Ethereal before 0.10.11 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory exhaustion) via unknown vectors.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMemory exhaustion vulnerability in Ethereal's NDPS (Novell Distributed Print Services) dissector before version 0.10.11 allows remote attackers to cause denial of service by sending specially crafted network packets that trigger excessive memory allocation during packet dissection.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 0.8= 0.8.13= 0.8.14= 0.8.15= 0.8.18= 0.8.19= 0.9= 0.9.1= 0.9.2= 0.9.3= 0.9.4= 0.9.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Ethereal installation and versionRun 'ethereal -v' or check the application version through the UI (Help > About Ethereal)Affected if The installed version matches 0.8.x or 0.9.x series listed in affected versions (0.8, 0.8.13, 0.8.14, 0.8.15, 0.8.18, 0.8.19, 0.9, 0.9.1, 0.9.2, 0.9.3, 0.9.4, 0.9.5)
-
Verify NDPS dissector is loadedOpen Ethereal and go to Analyze > Enabled Protocols. Search for 'NDPS' or 'NDS' in the protocol list and confirm it is enabled (checkbox checked)Affected if The NDPS protocol dissector is enabled in the protocol settings
-
Check for NDPS traffic captureStart a capture or open an existing capture file. Use the filter 'ndps' or 'nds' in the display filter bar to see if any NDPS packets are presentAffected if NDPS traffic is being dissected (visible in capture results)
You are affected if you have a vulnerable Ethereal version (0.8.x or 0.9.x) AND the NDPS dissector is enabled while processing network traffic that may contain NDPS packets.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to Ethereal 0.10.11 or later (or migrate to modern Wireshark). If legacy Ethereal must be used, disable the NDPS dissector or filter NDPS traffic at network perimeter.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2005-1467 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2005-1467 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data