CVE-2005-1744
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBEA WebLogic Server and WebLogic Express 7.0 through Service Pack 5 does not log out users when an application is redeployed, which allows those users to continue to access the application without having to log in again, which may be in violation of newly changed security constraints or role mappings.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceBEA WebLogic Server and WebLogic Express versions 7.0 through Service Pack 5 fail to invalidate user sessions when an application is redeployed. This session persistence allows authenticated users to continue accessing the application without re-authentication, bypassing any updated security constraints or role mappings that may have changed in the new deployment.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 7.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify WebLogic Server versionCheck the WebLogic installation directory for version information. Look for a file called 'version.txt' or check the registry/console for the exact version and Service Pack level. Common paths: BEA_HOME/weblogic700/ or check the startWebLogic.cmd/.sh script for version strings.Affected if The installed version is WebLogic Server or WebLogic Express 7.0 through Service Pack 5 (SP5)
-
Verify session-based authentication is in useInspect the application's web.xml deployment descriptor (or the equivalent WebLogic deployment plan) for <session-config> elements. Also check if applications use form-based or certificate authentication that creates user sessions.Affected if Applications are configured to use session-based authentication (HTTP sessions) for securing access
-
Check for recent or planned application redeploymentReview WebLogic console or admin logs for redeployment events (look for 'Redeploy' or 'Undeploy' commands, or the 'isRedeploying' method calls). Check deployment timestamps against security constraint updates.Affected if Applications have been or will be redeployed after security constraint or role mapping changes without manual session invalidation
-
Inspect session persistence configurationCheck the application's session descriptor in weblogic.xml or the WebLogic console for session persistence settings. Look for <session-descriptor> with persistent-store-type settings.Affected if Session persistence is enabled and the server was not restarted after redeployment
You are affected if running WebLogic Server/Express 7.0 through SP5 AND you use session-based authentication AND applications with updated security constraints have been redeployed without manual session invalidation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to WebLogic Server version 7.0 Service Pack 6 or later, which includes the session invalidation fix. If upgrade is not feasible, implement manual session invalidation scripts or processes before application redeployment.
WebLogic Server 8.1 or later (e.g., 9.x, 10.x)
- Upgrade from WebLogic Server 7.0 to WebLogic Server 8.1 or later. Newer versions handle session invalidation properly during application redeployment.
- After upgrading, verify that user sessions are properly invalidated when applications are redeployed by testing the redeployment scenario with test user accounts.
- Ensure that any custom security configurations or role mappings are reviewed after the upgrade to confirm they are enforced correctly.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2005-1744 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2005-1744 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data