Weblogic ServerApplication · Bea

CVE-2005-1748

MEDIUM · 5.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2005-05-24
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The embedded LDAP server in BEA WebLogic Server and Express 8.1 through Service Pack 4, and 7.0 through Service Pack 5, allows remote anonymous binds, which may allow remote attackers to view user entries or cause a denial of service.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The embedded LDAP server in BEA WebLogic Server and Express versions 8.1 through Service Pack 4 and 7.0 through Service Pack 5 permits remote anonymous binds, enabling unauthenticated attackers to query user directory entries or potentially trigger denial-of-service conditions.

MitigationDisable anonymous LDAP binds on the embedded LDAP server by configuring authentication requirements in the WebLogic Server console or LDAP configuration files, and apply the latest available service packs for the respective versions.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Weblogic ServerApplication
Affected:= 6.0= 6.1= 7.0= 7.0.0.1= 8.1
Weblogic PortalApplication
Affected:= 8.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify WebLogic version
    Check the installed WebLogic Server or Portal version by inspecting the product installation directory or using the WebLogic Administration Console (usually accessible at http://hostname:port/console). The version is typically displayed on the console login page or in the installation manifest files.
    Affected if Version is 6.0, 6.1, 7.0, 7.0.0.1, 8.0, or 8.1 (specifically with Service Pack 4 or earlier for 8.1, and Service Pack 5 or earlier for 7.0)
  2. Verify embedded LDAP server is in use
    In the WebLogic Administration Console, navigate to the Domain Configuration > Security > Embedded LDAP tab, or inspect the config.xml file in the domain directory for an <EmbeddedLDAP> configuration element.
    Affected if The embedded LDAP server is enabled and configured as the authentication provider backend
  3. Confirm anonymous LDAP bind is permitted
    In the WebLogic Administration Console, go to Domain > Security > Embedded LDAP and check the 'Allow Anonymous Binds' or similar setting. Alternatively, review the config.xml file for the <AllowAnonymousBind> element under the <EmbeddedLDAP> configuration.
    Affected if Anonymous LDAP binds are allowed (the setting is enabled or the configuration element is present and set to true)
  4. Test LDAP anonymous access externally
    Use an LDAP client tool (such as ldapsearch or ldapadmin) to attempt an anonymous bind to the LDAP port (default 389) of the WebLogic server: ldapsearch -h <hostname> -p 389 -b '' -s base '(objectclass=*)' namingContexts
    Affected if The bind succeeds without providing credentials, confirming the vulnerability is exploitable

A user is affected if they run an affected WebLogic version (6.0 through 8.1) with the embedded LDAP server enabled and anonymous binds permitted, allowing unauthenticated directory access.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Disable anonymous LDAP binds on the embedded LDAP server by configuring authentication requirements in the WebLogic Server console or LDAP configuration files, and apply the latest available service packs for the respective versions.

Fix this in Weblogic Server Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,060
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2005-1748 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2005-1748 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data